Idaho dropped Medicaid recipients instead of trying hard to track them down : Shots

Idaho dropped Medicaid recipients instead of trying hard to track them down : Shots

Idaho removed nearly 10,000 people from Medicaid in the pandemic’s first years when enrollees couldn’t be reached. The episode previews what could occur in other states after April 1, when a COVID-era coverage mandate ends.

Eric Harkleroad/KHN


hide caption

toggle caption

Eric Harkleroad/KHN


Idaho removed nearly 10,000 people from Medicaid in the pandemic’s first years when enrollees couldn’t be reached. The episode previews what could occur in other states after April 1, when a COVID-era coverage mandate ends.

Eric Harkleroad/KHN

During the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, while the federal government was trying to prevent people on Medicaid from losing health coverage, Idaho dropped nearly 10,000 people from the safety-net program.

Federal law generally banned states from dropping people, and federal officials said Idaho acted improperly. Idaho officials, however, said they didn’t think they did anything wrong.

The episode, revealed in documents KHN obtained through a public records request and in interviews with state officials, offers a preview of what could soon unfold across the United States for millions of people covered through Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for people with low incomes.

It shows how easily state bureaucracies can disenroll people they shouldn’t be disenrolling, leaving those people in financial and medical jeopardy. It also illustrates the potential for confusion and disagreement over what procedures states should follow before cutting off anyone’s benefits, particularly when enrollees can’t be reached.

Why it could happen in other states starting April 1

A COVID-19 relief law Congress enacted in 2020 prohibited states from removing people from Medicaid except in a few narrow circumstances, such as if an enrollee died or moved out of state.

On April 1 of this year, after the prohibition expires, states will resume removing people who no longer qualify or do not furnish needed information. That process has come to be known as “the unwinding.” Some states see the end of the mandate as a chance to quickly winnow Medicaid rolls that have grown to record levels.

Idaho Gov. Brad Little was among 25 Republican governors who told President Joe Biden in a December letter, that, by keeping ineligible people on the Medicaid rolls, the mandate was “negatively affecting states.”

Idaho’s Medicaid program had nearly 450,000 enrollees at the start of this month. The state said about 150,000 of them no longer qualified or had not been in contact with the program during the public health emergency.

By the time recipients notice, ‘the damage will be done’

Nationally, as disenrollments ramp up, many officials are predicting a mess. The Department of Health and Human Services has predicted that nearly 7 million people still entitled to Medicaid benefits will lose coverage because they fail to complete renewals or state governments won’t be able to contact them.

People may not realize they’ve been dropped until they seek care.

“The damage will be done,” said Tricia Brooks, a research professor with Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families.

Idaho terminated Medicaid benefits for more than 9,800 beneficiaries during the pandemic after mail the state sent them was returned as undeliverable and other attempts to confirm that they still resided in Idaho failed, according to emails obtained by KHN between the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

The emails, sent last spring and summer, detail Idaho’s rationale for the terminations, CMS’ concerns, and the state’s efforts to restore benefits.

CMS officials maintained that, when Idaho’s mailings were returned with no forwarding address or an out-of-state forwarding address, the state didn’t do enough to make contact with the beneficiaries and ensure they no longer lived in Idaho.

“CMS appreciates the state’s efforts to come into compliance,” Sarah O’Connor, a CMS official, wrote on Aug. 18 of last year.

In meetings with CMS, Idaho officials were told the state could not kick people off if it didn’t make “physical contact,” Shane Leach, administrator of the Division of Welfare at Idaho’s Department of Health and Welfare, recounted in correspondence with CMS.

“What they were saying early on,” Leach told KHN, “is, basically, we didn’t do enough outreach to really prove that this person was no longer in Idaho and not eligible for Medicaid.”

He added: “My perspective is, we did our due diligence.”

Many calls and letters went unanswered, Idaho says

For the first two years of the pandemic, when Idaho received returned mail with an out-of-state forwarding address or no forwarding address — possibly indicating the enrollee no longer lived in Idaho — Leach said state officials would call them.

A lot of the calls went unanswered, he said.

“They’re really concerned about physically talking to the person or having them say, ‘Yes, I’m in another state,'” Leach said of CMS. “And so that’s where they said, ‘OK, well, you need to reinstate those individuals.'”

“We felt like we were following the guidance,” said Jennifer Palagi, a deputy director at the Idaho health department.

CMS guidance in August 2021 stated that returned mail alone was not reason enough to disenroll Medicaid beneficiaries during the public health emergency. But if CMS had issued a written version of the standard to which it was holding Idaho — in which disenrollments would be justified only if the state made contact with the enrollee — Medicaid consumer advocates and other specialists said they were unaware of it.

CMS declined to answer several questions about the Idaho situation.

“CMS is committed to working with states to ensure continuity of coverage for eligible individuals, including those for whom the Medicaid agency receives returned mail,” Bruce Alexander, director of CMS’ office of communications, said in a written statement to KHN.

According to the batch of emails obtained by KHN, Idaho in March 2022 did change the state’s procedures after discussions with CMS. By July, the state Medicaid agency had reinstated benefits for 6,400 people the state couldn’t get hold of.

In one of the emails the Idaho Medicaid agency sent to CMS last July, the state said it was reviewing the extent to which it needed to pay medical bills the program had originally rejected.

It’s a long-standing problem — and about to get bigger

The inability to reach Medicaid enrollees has been a long-standing problem. The paperwork that agencies send people to fill out often goes unreturned. Some ends up at the wrong address. Up-to-date phone numbers or email addresses may not be available to state and county workers.

“In a perfect situation, a member responds to give you their current address, a phone number, an email address, etc.,” said Jack Rollins, director of federal policy for the National Association of Medicaid Directors. “But that is not the case for a lot of situations.”

And that’s bound to become a larger problem, consumer advocates say, after the pandemic-era enrollment mandate ends this spring. On Jan. 27 of this year, CMS detailed to health agencies in all states the minimum they’ll need to do to reach a Medicaid recipient who hasn’t responded to a mailed form: Before ending benefits, a state must try to obtain up-to-date contact information and attempt to reach the person through at least two means, such as by mail, phone, email or text message, if those means are available.

Still, “there’s just a lot of variation in terms of what that could look like,” said Farah Erzouki, a senior health policy analyst for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a think tank in Washington, D.C.

If any state isn’t following the rules, Georgetown University’s Brooks said, it can take months to fix the problems — all while people’s benefits hang in the balance.

“This is what we want to avoid,” Brooks said. “We don’t need to spend the next three years after ‘the unwinding’ trying to get people back on who should not have been disenrolled.”

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is an editorially independent, national program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation).

Patients losing out amid slump in NHS clinical trials, warn top clinicians | Medical research

The state of clinical trials in the NHS is “much worse than it has been in years” with patients losing access to cutting-edge cancer and dementia treatments, one of the UK’s most senior clinicians has warned.

Sir John Bell, the regius professor of medicine at the University of Oxford and a government life sciences adviser, said the UK’s approach needed “a full overhaul, top to bottom” to prevent a collapse in the number of clinical trials being conducted in the NHS.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that companies are choosing not to evaluate their drugs in the UK,” he said. “The risks [to patients] are much bigger than have been alluded to.”

The intervention comes after the government launched an independent review led by the former health minister James O’Shaughnessy into why the NHS had seen a 44{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} drop in participants recruited to commercial clinical trials in the past five years. The UK is rapidly losing ground to countries such as Spain, Poland and Australia, falling from fourth to 10th internationally for phase III trials.

Prof John Bell.
Prof John Bell says patients get access to groundbreaking treatments and the NHS makes money from conducting commercial trials. Photograph: Sophia Evans/The Observer

Reduced access to trials is particularly concerning for patients with limited routine treatment options, such as the roughly 3.5 million people living with rare diseases and patients with dementia and advanced cancer.

Beyond clinical benefits, the NHS makes money from conducting commercial trials. “You get the drugs for free, you get the treatment for the control arm for free, the NHS rides for free for everyone in the trial and pharma pays pretty well to get these trials done,” said Bell.

However, Bell said bureaucracy that had been simplified during the pandemic to fast-track trials had “crept back into the system and ossified” and the overstretched NHS workforce was losing capacity for research. “The system needs a pretty serious revamp,” said Bell. “[The government] is not going to fix this by just turning the handle a bit harder.”

Official figures show just 52{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of trials in the NHS are running to schedule – a significant improvement in recent months but still some way from the target the Department of Health has set for 80{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} trials being delivered to time and target by June.

The department has directed funders to shut down any trials that have missed their target to start recruiting by more than 90 days, with one in 10 trials being monitored under its Reset Research programme set to close prematurely. Five hundred trials have been closed under the initiative since May last year.

Other senior clinicians also raised concerns. Prof James Rowe, a senior dementia researcher at the University of Cambridge and consultant neurologist, said the UK’s lengthy approvals process could leave clinicians and their patients frozen out of international multicentre trials.

“If it’s going to take you 12 months to get started in the UK, by the time you get the green light the trial is effectively closing for recruitment internationally. It could be futile to begin the work to set up,” he said.

“It’s a great pity as there’s fantastic progress in the dementia world. There are 300 clinical trials for dementia worldwide. The UK should be at the forefront of this, not putting up barriers.”

Prof Paul Stewart, the vice-president (clinical) of the Academy of Medical Sciences and of the University of Leeds, said research tended to be viewed as a luxury rather than an integral part of the NHS’s mission.

“As I reflect on my 40-year career in the NHS, there have always been challenges, but now the crisis has come to a head in terms of a research capacity issue. The current environment is extremely challenging,” he said.

Dr Ian Walker, of Cancer Research UK, said the pandemic continued to “cast a long shadow” over clinical research. “As backlogs for diagnosis and treatment grow, NHS staff face more pressures and protecting time for research is increasingly difficult,” he said. “If this pattern continues, it means slower progress towards brand new treatments for cancer.”

George Freeman, the minister at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, said: “Commercial clinical trials are absolutely vital to both our UK life sciences sector and widening NHS patient access to innovative medicines all across the UK. The UK has traditionally been a strong global location for trials, as demonstrated most recently through the groundbreaking Covid recovery trial which was set up in record time and was the world’s largest randomised controlled trial for Covid-19.

“However, our life sciences sector has reported a 44{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} fall in recruitment of patients to commercial clinical trials between 2017 and 2021 – so it is vital that we act to rebuild competitiveness.”

Patient Burnout Is a Simmering Public Health Crisis

You haven’t been feeling well lately. You’re more tired than usual, a bit sluggish. You wonder if there’s something wrong with your diet. Or maybe you’re anemic? You call your primary-­care doctor’s office to schedule an appointment. They inform you the next available appointment is in three weeks.

So, you wait.

And then you wait some more.

And then, when you arrive on the day of your appointment, you wait even more.

You fill out the mountain of required paperwork, but the doctor still isn’t ready to see you. You flip through a magazine for a while, then scroll through your phone until you’re finally called. You wait a little longer in a scratchy paper gown, then talk to your physician—if you can call it talking, since she’s mostly staring at a computer screen—for all of 10 minutes before you’re back out in the lobby with a lab order to have your blood tested.

Then you call to set up your blood test, and the waiting process starts over.

A few weeks after you get your results, a bill arrives in the mail. You’re charged hundreds of dollars for the blood work. The appointment was over in minutes, but your bank account will feel the effects for a long time.


More from TIME


Going to the doctor may never be a fun experience, but surely it can be better than it is right now. In 2019, even before the COVID-19 pandemic rocked the foundations of health care, an Ipsos survey found that 43{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of Americans were unsatisfied with their medical system, far more than the 22{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of people in the U.K. and 26{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of people in Canada who were unsatisfied with theirs. By 2022, three years into the pandemic, just 12{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of U.S. adults said health care was handled “extremely” or “very” well in the U.S., according to a poll from the Associated Press–NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

Americans pay a premium for the care they rate so poorly. The U.S. spends more per capita on health care than any other developed country in the world but has subpar health outcomes. Average life expectancy is lower in the U.S. than in other wealthy nations, and about 60{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of U.S. adults have a chronic disease. About 10{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of the population doesn’t have health insurance.

And the customer service sucks. U.S. patients are tired of waiting weeks or months for appointments that are over in minutes. They’re tired of high prices and surprise bills. They’re tired of providers who treat them like electronic health record entries, rather than people.

That could dissuade them from getting medical care at all—and if that happens, America may get a whole lot sicker than it already is. Patients are, in a phrase, burned out.


Primary care is supposed to be the bedrock of the U.S. medical system. In theory, patients get annual physicals so doctors can assess their overall health and detect any red flags (or refer them to specialists who can) before those warning signs become full-blown chronic disease. While experts debate whether everyone needs a checkup each year, studies show that on balance, patients who regularly see a physician tend to be healthier and live longer than those who don’t.

Yet about a quarter of American adults don’t have a primary-care provider, and, as of 2021, almost 20{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} hadn’t seen any doctor during the past year. There are many barriers: it can take weeks to get an appointment, particularly in more rural areas where fewer doctors practice, and visits can be costly even for people with insurance. Research shows that during the past year, financial strain caused about 40{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of U.S. adults to delay or go without medical care.

Plus, people just don’t like going. A third of participants in one 2015 study said they had avoided going to the doctor because they found it unpleasant, citing factors like rude or inattentive providers, long wait times, and difficulty finding a convenient appointment. Many people also skipped appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic, largely because of office closures and fears of the virus—but one study found that people were more likely to forgo doctor’s visits during the pandemic if they’d had previous poor experiences with health care. People of color, women, and people who are overweight frequently report feeling mistreated by their doctors.

Jen Russon, a 48-year-old English teacher and mother of two from Florida, says she can’t remember a single positive experience she’s had with a doctor. She struggles to square the $400 her family pays in monthly insurance costs with what she characterizes as a rushed and underwhelming care experience that pales in comparison with the attention her pets get at the veterinarian. “I wish we could see our vet instead, because they really spend a lot of time” with their patients, she says.

Part of the problem may go back to the way doctors are trained, says Jennifer Taber, an associate professor of psychological sciences at Kent State University and a co-author of the 2015 study on doctor avoidance. U.S. medical schools do an excellent job of teaching students how to practice medicine. But, she argues, they aren’t always as good at preparing students to be doctors, with all the interpersonal complexity that entails. “Patients won’t necessarily want to go back to doctors they don’t like,” she says. Even small gestures, like making eye contact with or leaning toward a patient as they speak, can help build a strong rapport, Taber says.

The pandemic certainly hasn’t improved bedside manner. It’s pushed nearly every element of medical care to the brink and prompted some providers to leave the profession entirely, worsening existing personnel shortages and contributing to an epidemic of physician burnout. According to one recent survey, 30{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of U.S. physicians said they felt burned out in late 2022, and about as many said they’d considered leaving the profession in the previous six months.

Physician burnout only adds to patient burnout, says Dr. Bengt Arnetz, a professor at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine who researches how to improve primary care. “Providers feel stressed, burned out, less empathetic. A lot of times they don’t engage the patient, and the patient wants to be engaged,” Arnetz says.

But these problems didn’t start with the pandemic, says Lori Knutson, executive director of the Whole Health Institute, a nonprofit focused on improving health care delivery. “We should all be honest,” she says, “about the fact that health care has been slowly imploding for a period of time.”


It’s impossible to explain problems with U.S. health care without talking about insurance. U.S. patients pay more out of pocket for health care than people in other wealthy, developed countries, most of which offer some form of universal health coverage.

The insurance system is also endlessly confusing, says Dr. Ateev Mehrotra, a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School. Doctors may not know how much the tests they’re recommending cost, particularly when every patient has a different type and level of coverage, so surprise bills are common—and so hard to understand that patients often have to spend hours on the phone seeking clarity from their insurance providers. One 2020 study estimated that dealing with insurance companies costs the U.S. more than $20 billion annually in lost productivity.

How doctors get paid affects the patient experience too. Many health systems pay physicians based on how many appointments and procedures they squeeze in, which rewards lightning-fast visits over those that are “about the whole person and not just what’s wrong with them,” Knutson says. This system can also incentivize doctors to recommend tests and procedures that aren’t strictly necessary, which leads to extra costs and hassle for patients and added strain on the health care system.

Here, too, insurance is part of the problem. Doctors in primary care or family medicine often make significantly less than specialists, in part because their services are reimbursed at lower rates. That dissuades some medical-school graduates—particularly those saddled with debts—from entering general medicine, which contributes to shortages in the medical fields patients are most likely to need on a regular basis. When there aren’t enough doctors to go around, appointments get scarcer and physicians become overworked, rushing from appointment to appointment and drowning in paperwork.

Some simple solutions exist. In a study published in 2020, Arnetz and his colleagues analyzed what happened when one small medical clinic made minor tweaks to its operations, such as reassigning some of the main provider’s administrative duties to nurses or medical assistants and adding short team meetings to delegate tasks for the day. After two weeks, the clinic scored higher than a comparison clinic on measures of efficiency, contributing to better patient and provider satisfaction.

Traditional medical offices could also take cues from the services patients are increasingly gravitating toward, says Pearl McElfish, who researches health services at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Patients who can afford it are flocking to startups offering perks like same-day appointments and flat-rate monthly memberships. And one 2018 study co-authored by Mehrotra found that visits to urgent-care clinics, where patients can walk in instead of waiting for weeks, increased by more than 100{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} from 2008 to 2015 among privately insured U.S. adults. (During roughly the same period, primary-care visits dropped 24{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}.) During the pandemic, urgent-care centers only became more popular—as did telehealth.

“Currently [the traditional system] isn’t meeting the needs of many patients,” Mehrotra says. “Patients are voting with their feet and going to these other care sites.”

The trouble with convenience-first medical care, however, is that it’s often issue-specific. If you go in to get a flu shot, you’ll get that vaccine and then be on your way. The clinician is unlikely to make sure you’re up to date on your other shots or perform recommended screenings—the kind of preventive care that can fend off bigger issues down the line. On the other hand, these newer options can “put pressure on existing providers to be a bit more patient-centric,” Mehrotra says.

Traditional medical offices could make some changes right away, without waiting for big structural overhauls, he says. They could offer “walk-in only” hours to treat people without appointments, text patients when the doctor is ready to see them, and include clear explanations on bills so patients understand what they’re paying for. Even small shifts like these could make significant differences to patients.

The stakes are high. Ashley, who is 35 and asked to use only her first name to protect her privacy, has a gene mutation that heightens her risk of breast cancer and is supposed to get an annual mammogram and two ultrasounds per year. But she has to move frequently for her job in academia and hasn’t had her tests done in four years because she got so fed up with the arduous process of finding new doctors, transferring medical records, and dealing with insurance every time she moves. “The barriers were enough that I just kept putting it off,” she says.

Burned-out patients may retreat from the institutions that made them feel that way. Ashley says she’s considering a preventive double mastectomy—a surgery she may have needed anyway because of her genetic predisposition, but one made more appealing by her desire to stop dealing with “pain in the butt” medical appointments. Russon, from Florida, says she’s felt tempted to cancel her family’s insurance and go to the doctor only when absolutely necessary, though she’s never acted on the urge. Other patients, however, may walk away from the health care system entirely. It may not be the wisest or healthiest response, but it’s a human one.

More Must-Reads From TIME


Write to Jamie Ducharme at jamie.ducharme@time.com.

Tips to optimise your post-workout meal to make most of your gym session

Heading to the gym for a good workout session? While you may have your goals set on the workout planned, are you aware of the other elements playing a role in this fitness journey of yours, with food playing a key one? Working out and eating right together help in shaping a healthier version of yourself. Pre and post-workout meals need to be planned wisely so that you get the optimum benefit of your calorie-burning effort. In this article, the focus is on eating the correct nutrients after a workout and how you can perk up your post-workout meal.

Why you may feel hungry after a gym session?

To help you consume the right nutrients after a workout, let us first understand why you feel hungry after an enriching gym session.

post-workout meal
Tips to optimise your post-workout meal. Image courtesy: Adobe stock
  • Endurance exercises consume the glycogen that is stored in the muscles and reduction can make you feel hungry.
  • ‘Hunger hormones’ or Ghrelin are released while exercising, which can make you hungry.
  • Exercising also results in the dispensation of endorphins that makes you prone to hunger as your body is calm and stress-free.
  • While exercising, your energy disbursement spikes up, leading to hunger. So, if you work out on an empty stomach, you feel hungry as the body searches for substitute energy to replace the calories burnt during a workout.

How post-workout meal helps?

Carbohydrates after your workout help restores the glycogen stored in the muscles. Also, a post-workout meal helps in reducing muscle protein breakdown that is a result of the exercises. So, proteins after your workout help in repairing and rebuilding the tissues that have broken down during exercising and aid in better muscle growth and strength.

Plan your post-workout meal right!

A post-workout meal that maintains the balance of carbohydrates and proteins helps in a wholesome recovery that also succours your performance in future workouts.

To optimise your post-workout meal, a good rule of thumb to follow is to eat in the proportion that for every 1 gm of protein, you eat 4 grams of carbohydrates. Also, including food rich in healthy fats, vitamins, minerals, and antioxidant-rich foods as post-workout meals will help in reducing muscle cramps and inflammation.

It’s advisable to eat whole foods which help in easy digestion and are nutrient-dense like fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats. With these foods, the body is provided with nutrients that help it recover and become stronger. Some of the good post-workout meals include egg omelette with avocado, rolled oats meal with banana, almonds, whey protein, cottage cheese, quinoa with sweet potato, Greek yogurt, granola, etc.

While a post-workout meal is important, what is equally vital is the timing of the post-workout meal. Your body absorbs most nutrients immediately after exercising. So, ideally, a post-workout meal should be eaten within 30 minutes to an hour after your workout.

post-workout meal
Tips to optimise your post-workout meal. Image courtesy: Adobe stock

What not to eat post-workout?

While it’s a must to eat post-workout meals, there are some foods that are a big NO after working out as consumption of these foods will lead to the loss of the essence of a workout in the first place. These include:

  • Foods high in fats as these slow down the nutrition absorption process thus delaying recovery
  • Processed foods as they are preservative-laden and have a heavy amount of sugar
  • Alcohol as they dehydrate the body

Conclusion

Finally, always remember that it’s completely normal to be hungry after a good gym session. What is important is you eat in half an hour to one hour of you exercising and eat a balanced meal that will aid in restocking the glycogen, repair the muscle tissues and give the body the right nutrients for it to recover properly. Also, stay hydrated by drinking enough water before, during, and after your workout.

Mass General Brigham selects Medline as strategic vendor for medical supplies

Medline selected by leading integrated academic healthcare system for prime vendor agreement

NORTHFIELD, Ill., Feb. 27, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — Medline and premier Massachusetts-based Mass General Brigham have entered into a multi-year prime vendor agreement. After being with a previous vendor for over 25 years, Medline will now be the exclusive provider of medical and surgical supplies across the integrated academic healthcare system’s continuum of care, including the system’s acute care facilities and network for ambulatory surgery centers and physician offices.  

At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mass General Brigham tapped Medline to augment the health system’s storage capacity with third-party logistics (3PL) solutions enabled by Medline’s state-of-the-art 840,000 sq. ft. Uxbridge, Mass. distribution center. With the expansion of the strategic relationship, in addition to 3PL solutions, Mass General Brigham will also leverage Medline’s supply chain optimization and logistical expertise to advance its supply chain operations and resiliency efforts. 

“Working with Medline allows us to leverage their entire scope of expertise in the areas of supply chain logistics and clinical solutions to ultimately help improve our operating performance,” said Lisa Scannell, vice president of supply chain for Mass General Brigham. “We look forward to evolving this strategic relationship to achieve greater resiliency and standardization in our system’s supply chain.”

As part of the agreement, on-site Medline analysts will work hand-in-hand with leaders to address specific caregiver needs and help drive new ways of optimizing care in a commitment to providing enhanced support and service. In addition, Mass General Brigham will have the ability to easily monitor key metrics such as item utilization, contract compliance, price accuracy, and spend by product categories through Medline’s advanced analytics platforms.

“We are honored to expand our business relationship with Mass General Brigham and are committed to becoming an extension of their team, going to great lengths to understand the system’s needs,” said Jim Digiacomo, executive account director for Medline. “Combining their mission to serve the community with Medline’s agility and scale, this partnership will enable us to create customized solutions to help healthcare run better.” 

Learn how Medline tailors solutions across the entire continuum of care as a manufacturer and distributor by visiting https://www.medline.com/supply-chain.   

About Medline
Medline is a healthcare company; a manufacturer, distributor, and solutions provider focused on improving the overall operating performance of healthcare. Partnering with healthcare systems and facilities across the continuum of care, Medline provides the clinical and supply chain resources required for long-term financial viability in delivering high-quality care. With the scale of one of the country’s largest companies and the agility of a family-led business, Medline is able to invest in its customers for the future and rapidly respond to a dynamically changing market with customized solutions. Headquartered in Northfield, Ill., Medline has 30,000+ employees worldwide and does business in more than 125 countries and territories. Learn more about Medline at https://www.medline.com.

About Mass General Brigham
Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic healthcare system, uniting great minds in medicine to make life-changing impact for patients in our communities and people around the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, community and specialty hospitals, a health insurance plan, physician networks, community health centers, home care, and long-term care services. Mass General Brigham is a non-profit organization that is committed to patient care, research, teaching, and service to the community. In addition, Mass General Brigham is one of the nation’s leading biomedical research organizations and a principal teaching affiliate of Harvard Medical School. For more information, please visit www.massgeneralbrigham.org.    

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MedlineIndustriesInc
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Medline
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/company/9402
YouTube: https://twitter.com/Medline

SOURCE Medline

Sagittarius Horoscope Today, February 25, 2023: A healthy lifestyle ahead | Astrology

SAGITTARIUS (Nov 23-Dec 21)

Daily astrological prediction says, sagittarius people are creative and successful because of their independent spirit and drive to take charge of situations. If you work hard and do your job well, you will get noticed by important people. If you had a family to help you, you wouldn’t have to worry about anything. For the sake of your loved ones, it’s in everyone’s best interest that you craft a sublime rhythm in your life. Today is a good day for native Sagittarians to make money through property and money deals. Buying a home or inheriting one from a relative appears to be a feasible option. An adventure abroad could be just the thing to ignite your creativity. Because you always try your hardest in school, you eventually succeed. Although you aren’t ready, you’ll do fine in the situation at hand. Sagittarius students have a good chance of doing well on a significant exam. There will come a time when a friend from the past will come to you for help with their investments. They can benefit from hearing your opinion or receiving your counsel.

Sagittarius Finance Today

Financial success could be attained with the help of a Sagittarius native’s brilliant ideas. Going on a business trip could be an opportunity to expand your professional network. Obtaining a loan at the right time is crucial for the company’s growth.

Sagittarius Family Today

Due to a child’s misbehaviour, you will have to make serious efforts today to bring the family back together. To find a solution, show some compassion and understanding. It’s time to kick back and take it easy at a relative’s house.

Sagittarius Career Today

You must realise your full potential now to advance your career. You’ll get far in your career if you can keep the energy up and make the most of your communication skills. The Sagittarius’s willingness to take chances would impress even their harshest critics.

Sagittarius Health Today

A healthy, well-rounded diet is a great tool for modern living. Developing strong bones and lungs are just two benefits of regular exercise. Maintain a regular exercise routine.

Sagittarius Love Life Today

Sagittarius natives need to adjust their methods if they want to introduce maturity and a fresh perspective to romantic ties. You may finally be able to end that love-hate relationship once and for all.

Lucky Number: 11

Lucky Colour: Brown

By: Manisha Koushik, Dr Prem Kumar Sharma

(Astrologer, Palmist, Numerologist & Vastu Consultant)

Email: support@askmanisha.com, psharma@premastrologer.com

Url: www.askmanisha.com, www.premastrologer.com

Contact: Panchkula: +91-172-2562832, 2572874

Delhi: +91-11-47033152, 40532026