Transgender patients face discrimination during health care visits

One trans woman recalled a doctor calling her “it.” A nonbinary person was grilled about their use of “they/them” pronouns during an ultrasound. A trans-masculine person moved out of Tennessee, fearing they would lose access to hormone therapy as legislators passed bills restricting gender-affirming care.

Transgender Americans often face subtle discrimination, outright hostility and ill-informed medical professionals in their interactions with the health-care system, according to a poll by The Washington Post and KFF, a nonprofit focused on national health issues.

Challenges arise during routine medical visits as well as when transgender people seek hormone therapy and other forms of gender-affirming care.

Nearly half (47 percent) of trans adults say the health-care providers they have come in contact with know “not too much” or “nothing at all” about providing health care to trans people. Just 10 percent say the health-care providers they have come in contact with know “a lot” about caring for trans people. About 4 in 10 (37 percent) trans adults say it is “somewhat” or “very” difficult to find a health-care provider who treats them with dignity and respect; while about a quarter (24 percent) of cisgender adults say the same. Just over half (53 percent) of trans adults say it is easy to find health care they can afford, less than the 63 percent of cisgender adults who say the same.

Activists say a welcoming health-care system would include affordable access to gender-affirming care from counseling to surgery. Good care also includes professionals treating transgender people with respect, using their preferred pronouns and not being quick to blame hormone treatment for unrelated medical problems.

About 3 in 10 trans adults say they have had to teach a doctor or other health-care provider about trans people so they could get appropriate care, had a doctor or other health-care provider refuse to acknowledge their preferred gender identity and instead refer to their sex assigned at birth, or been asked unnecessary or invasive questions about their gender identity unrelated to the medical reason for their visit. About 1 in 6 trans adults say they have had a doctor or other health-care provider refuse to provide them with gender-affirming care, such as hormone treatments.

The Post-KFF poll is the largest nongovernmental survey of U.S. trans adults to rely on random sampling methods. It builds on a body of research that has often demonstrated poor access to health care for transgender people but with limited data.

“LGBTQ+ people experience high levels of stigma and discrimination and victimization that persists across the lifetime, and this new work amplifies that,” said Lindsey Dawson, director of LGBTQ Health Policy at KFF.

“To have your gender affirmed and to be in an inclusive environment where you have to be quite vulnerable about gender identity can be quite meaningful,” Dawson said. “To have negative experiences might dissuade somebody from accessing health care in the future.”

As Republican state lawmakers mobilize to restrict access to gender-affirming care for children — and in some cases, adults — the poll offers a reminder of the basic struggles transgender adults face in medical environments.

The poll finds trans people’s ease of access to health-care providers who treat them with dignity and respect is not significantly different in states that former president Donald Trump won compared with states President Biden won. The survey also finds that trans adults in urban areas are more likely to report having to educate health-care professionals (38 percent) than those in suburban/rural areas (23 percent) — challenging perceptions that more liberal areas are havens for tolerance and inclusivity.

In follow-up interviews, five transgender and nonbinary Americans who responded to the poll elaborated on their experiences:

Corey Brooks (they/them)

25, Pittsburgh

Even the name of the place Corey Brooks frequented for routine medical care — Magee-Womens Hospital — felt alienating.

Patients donned pink gowns. Cutouts of pink bras were plastered on the walls. A sign urged patients to “fight like a girl.”

“Things like that are just incredibly disorienting for someone going into those spaces who is always being reminded, hey, this wasn’t designed for you,” Brooks said. “You’re not really sure if you should disclose to these people that you’re trans or not.”

Brooks identifies as nonbinary and transgender, but as someone who was assigned female at birth, they share similar health needs as cisgender women for gynecologic care and screenings for chest health as they age.

Brooks was used to uncomfortable visits to the doctor, based on their college experiences when university health services staff peppered them with questions about birth control and sexual activity, assuming they were a cisgender heterosexual woman. They wrote their senior thesis on health access issues for transgender people and avoided the doctor for a few years after graduation.

The worst experience came while undergoing an ultrasound on their chest at the women’s hospital in Pittsburgh. The doctor paused and stared at Brooks’s medical file, spotting a note that they use they/them pronouns.

“What does that even mean?” Brooks recalled the doctor asking in a tone dripping with hostility rather than curiosity.

“As a trans person, that’s unfortunately not uncommon where you’re expected to provide all of this education for your providers,” Brooks said. “You wouldn’t expect a patient who is diagnosed with diabetes to have to educate their doctor on what diabetes is.”

Suzanne Rathburn (she/her)

70, Weed, Calif.

In the 1980s, a psychiatrist pushed his chair away from his desk and abruptly ended a meeting after Suzanne Rathburn explained she was trans. In 2012, a Veterans Affairs doctor referred to her as “it.”

In hundreds of medical visits over decades of navigating gender-affirming care and a rare genetic disease, Rathburn said she’s only had a few doctors she considers “good.”

As she began her transition in the 1980s after leaving the Air Force, Rathburn turned to the library to learn more about gender dysphoria and to find a therapist. She received a vaginoplasty. At the Oakland VA where she underwent hormone therapy, Rathburn said just one of the doctors treated her with respect, while others were dismissive of her medical needs or made negative comments about her gender identity — despite being in the LGBT-friendly San Francisco Bay Area.

Fed up after repeated indignities, Rathburn filed a discrimination complaint against another VA hospital that declined to perform a Pap test after several years of her requests. She said the VA eventually referred her to a doctor outside the system, and her complaint remained unresolved.

It wasn’t until she moved to rural Weed near the Oregon border in 2011 at age 59 that Rathburn experienced some of the best medical care of her life. A medical practice she visited near Medford, Ore., changed its intake forms when she pointed out gender questions were binary. A doctor in the nearby town of Mount Shasta, Calif., treated her trans identity as no big deal and spent time researching her genetic disease. Her therapist, also in Mount Shasta, specializes in supporting trans patients.

“I don’t have to explain it to her,” Rathburn said. “We talked about stuff I haven’t talked about with other therapists or to the psychiatrists I’ve had over 20 years.”

Hans Dirkmaat (they/he)

29, Longmont, Colo.

Hans Dirkmaat knew the nurse practitioner was ill-suited to care for transgender people when they had to explain what top surgery was.

During the primary-care visit, the provider marveled at why someone would want to remove their breasts. She asked, “When are you going to get a penis?”

Another medical professional in the room mouthed, “I’m sorry.”

Dirkmaat, who identifies as trans-masculine and nonbinary, didn’t have many choices for medical care that were in their insurance provider network when they lived in Nashville. They hoped the provider would have been more sensitive because she had mentioned having a lesbian daughter during their first appointment.

But tolerance for gay people does not mean a medical provider is attuned to the health-care needs of trans people. Transgender people weigh the risks and benefits of different aspects of gender-affirming medical care, and most have not received hormone therapy or transition-related surgeries.

Dirkmaat was wary of taking testosterone because of a heightened risk of cardiovascular complications. Their mother had died of heart disease at 41.

But that same nurse practitioner declined to prescribe medication to treat their high cholesterol because it could create pregnancy complications. The fact that Dirkmaat is married to a cisgender woman and has no plans to have children did not sway the provider. She said she would only authorize the pills if Dirkmaat were to undergo testosterone treatment.

“It’s very frustrating,” Dirkmaat said. “Like I can’t make decisions for me.”

The climate for transgender people in Nashville was starting to feel more unsafe, they said. The clinic specializing in transgender care where they received chest masculinization surgery became a magnet for right-wing protests, forcing the clinic to close on some days to protect patients. They drew more disgusted looks on the streets.

Tennessee GOP lawmakers joined the vanguard of a national movement to restrict care for transgender people, passing legislation to ban gender-affirming care for minors. Activists fear care for adults is next, noting legislation introduced to prohibit the state Medicaid program from working with insurers that cover gender-affirming care.

As Dirkmaat weighed whether to take hormones, they feared such therapy could be banned next.

So they moved to a suburb of Boulder, Colo., where a doctor who specializes in hormone therapy and its effects on the cardiovascular system is just an hour drive away.

Ezekiel Scott (he/they)

31, Columbus, Ohio

When Ezekiel Scott left Minnesota to attend college in Ohio last year, he brought six months’ worth of hormone medication just in case he ran into trouble resuming care. It wasn’t enough.

Administrators at Ohio State University assured Scott, who identifies as transgender and nonbinary, that hormone therapy would be covered under student health insurance. But first he needed to reestablish care with a doctor — and that proved to be a challenge.

He didn’t want to go to just any doctor, but one familiar with treating transgender patients. He had had negative experiences with doctors who were quick to blame the hormone therapy for mundane medical conditions, including one who suggested ending it to address a rash on his arm.

“That’s the first thing we’re going to try? Not like, I don’t know, a skin cream?” Scott said.

The hormones were essential to feeling comfortable in his own skin and affirming his gender identity, but the treatment was cast as cosmetic and unnecessary. “It’s like being told to stop having your own face,” he said.

It took four months to get an appointment at a university health clinic. After obtaining authorization to receive testosterone, a national shortage of the intramuscular injections further delayed his access to treatment as he exhausted his previous supply.

For several months, he had to ration weekly hormone injections that helped him develop facial hair and a deeper voice in line with his gender identity. And because he had had his ovaries removed, the absence of natural hormones risked his heart health.

His depression and anxiety grew worse, and he experienced suicidal ideations. Medication management for ADHD, once balanced with the hormone therapy, became complicated. He experienced hot flashes, an apparent result of early menopause caused by hormones not coming in properly.

Months later, he found a walk-in clinic recommended by a nonbinary friend. He got hormones that same day, eight months after he moved. His mental health improved, he could focus in school again, and the hot flashes ended.

“All of it is back in balance,” Scott said.

Richael Faithful (they/them)

37, Washington, D.C.

Richael Faithful is no stranger to cringeworthy moments during visits to the doctor.

Staff at some offices would misgender them. The first dermatologist they saw appeared nervous and avoided eye contact after Faithful disclosed being trans. One lung specialist they saw for breathing issues who seemed well-meaning shared a story about knowing “a transgender.”

“Once folks have bad experiences, it’s really hard to trust the health-care system again,” said Faithful, a D.C. resident who identifies as nonbinary and trans-masculine. “But I do want other trans folks and other cis folks to know there are good providers out there providing high-quality care.”

Faithful does not identify as a woman but is not transitioning to be a man either. For them, gender-affirming care means presenting more masculine to the world.

Faithful considers themselves part of the top 1 percent in being able to access gender-affirming care because they have the financial means and emotional support network to do so.

Faithful sought hormone therapy through a nurse practitioner at a medical concierge service with a reputation for being trans friendly and where membership costs $300 a year. They pay $265 every month and a half for hormones. They were able to travel with their partner to Florida for two weeks to undergo chest reconstruction surgery from a well-known plastic surgeon who does not accept health insurance and charges $15,000, paid in advance.

The staff at another dermatology practice where Faithful received acne treatment used the correct pronouns and showed a nuanced understanding of the relationship between hormone treatment and acne.

Faithful said they could afford these services as a consultant for social justice organizations who receives health insurance through their partner’s plan — while other Black transgender people living in the poorest parts of the city struggle to access basic gender-affirming care.

“My stress level is just kind of lower because I notice I’m not navigating even seemingly small things that just are distracting or annoying when they continue to happen,” Faithful said.

Scott Clement and Emily Guskin contributed to this report.

Trump vows to punish doctors, hospitals that provide gender-affirming care to transgender minors

Former President Trump, in a online video produced Tuesday on his social media platform, vowed to punish medical practitioners who offer gender-affirming wellbeing care to minors if he is reelected up coming year, wading into a contentious discussion that has captured the focus of state and federal lawmakers on both equally sides of the aisle.

In the just about 4-minute-lengthy, straight-to-camera online video, Trump outlined his program to “protect children from remaining-wing gender insanity,” unveiling a slate of serious policy proposals concentrating on transgender identities, such as a federal law that acknowledges only two genders and bars transgender girls from competing on women’s sports groups.

“No really serious region really should be telling its kids that they had been born with the mistaken gender,” Trump reported in the video ahead of falsely professing that being transgender is a strategy that the “radical left” made “just a few several years in the past.”

“Under my leadership, this madness will end,” he stated.

Trump, who officially announced his 2024 presidential bid in November, included that, if he is reelected, federal companies will be instructed to straight away stop programs that endorse the thought of gender changeover “at any age” and promised to prohibit federal tax pounds from becoming applied to assist shell out for gender-affirming interventions.

The previous president explained he also strategies to go a law barring minors from getting gender-affirming wellbeing treatment “in all 50 states” and intends to direct the Justice Division to investigate the pharmaceutical field and particular person hospitals to figure out whether or not they “deliberately included up horrific prolonged-expression aspect effects of intercourse transitions in purchase to get rich.”

Medical practitioners who address transgender youth will be booted from Medicaid and Medicare below his management, Trump explained Tuesday, and a private suitable of motion will be established for clients who afterwards regret having acquired gender-affirming health and fitness care as minors to sue their physicians.

Gender-affirming well being care — for both youths and grown ups — is deemed risk-free, medically vital and frequently existence-saving by most professional clinical organizations, such as the American Health care Association and American Academy of Pediatrics.

Even though the previous president has not earlier weighed in on gender-affirming overall health care for transgender minors, he has targeted transgender men and women extra generally, evidenced in component by his administration’s 2017 ban on transgender men and women serving in the armed forces, which he reported in a series of tweets would stress the government with “tremendous healthcare costs and disruption.”

Previous yr, in the course of a campaign rally in Texas, Trump said transgender women of all ages should really be barred from playing on women’s sports groups, vowing to “ban adult men from collaborating in women’s sports” if he is reelected.

At the very least 18 states have enacted legislation that bar transgender athletes from competing on sports activities teams dependable with their gender identification, and top rated Republicans in Congress, which includes Speaker Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), have backed federal legislation to that impact.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, observed as a major GOP contender for the 2024 presidential election, in 2021 signed a regulation barring transgender athletes from activity, and last year publicly refused to identify Lia Thomas, a transgender swimmer at the College of Pennsylvania, as the NCAA women’s 500-property winner, declaring Florida-indigenous Emma Weyant, the second-spot finisher, the race’s “rightful winner.”

DeSantis’s administration has also approved a number of controversial health and schooling policies that focus on transgender men and women, like a point out rule that prohibits transgender individuals from making use of Medicaid to assistance pay for gender-affirming wellbeing care and a legislation barring communicate of gender identification and sexual orientation in community faculty lecture rooms.

Trump on Tuesday said his proposed coverage improvements would in the same way extend to training, and college officers that suggest a child “could be trapped in the erroneous body” will be faced with “severe consequences” if he is reelected up coming calendar year, such as possible civil legal rights violations for sexual intercourse discrimination and the elimination of federal funding for educational facilities.

A new credentialing entire body for lecturers, Trump said, would advertise “positive schooling about the nuclear family, the roles of mothers and fathers and celebrating alternatively than erasing the things that make males and girls diverse and one of a kind.”

Transgender youth health care bans have a new target: adults

Lawmakers in at minimum 3 states this 12 months have submitted legislation meant to restrict accessibility to gender-affirming wellness treatment for men and women as outdated as 26, an escalation of a struggle waged nationwide final calendar year more than regardless of whether minors ought to be equipped to entry particular prescription remedies and techniques.

Expenses filed this year in Oklahoma, South Carolina and Virginia aim to bar state well being care companies from recommending or administering solutions like puberty blockers, hormones and gender-affirming surgeries to clients youthful than 21, signaling an aggravation in the fight about transgender overall health treatment.

Another Oklahoma bill filed this thirty day period would prohibit older people up to 25 from acquiring gender-affirming care in one of the most serious and restrictive bans launched to date. The state’s proposed “Millstone Act,” which gets its name from a Bible verse about punishing grownups who damage youngsters, would also block Oklahoma’s Medicaid program from giving coverage for “gender transition procedures” to folks youthful than 26.

“I don’t think it was at any time about youngsters,” Erin Reed, an unbiased legislative researcher, advised The Hill this week, referring to point out and federal attempts to ban gender-affirming treatment more than the previous two decades.

GOP legislators’ arguments against transgender well being treatment have in the earlier centered all-around a have to have to defend young children from alleged predatory health professionals and “woke” gender ideology. Charges filed across the place final yr utilized inflammatory and deceptive rhetoric to disparage gender-affirming treatment for youth with titles like the “Save Adolescents from Experimentation Act” and the “Protect Children’s Innocence Act.”

“These adult bans display that which is not what it was about,” Reed mentioned. “It’s about banning treatment totally. It’s about forcing transgender persons back in the closet.”

Point out legislators have not moved absent from youth overall health treatment bans fully, and dozens of costs searching for to ban gender-affirming treatment completely for minors have by now been introduced in much more than 10 states this calendar year.

Reed extra that she’s skeptical whether or not legislators sponsoring adult well being care bans this year hope these steps to move as penned. It is possible, she stated, that lawmakers are concentrating on older folks to make youth health and fitness care bans show up less serious and additional palatable.

“This is, in component, a way that they are trying to make it less difficult to move gender-affirming care bans for smaller teams in the inhabitants,” she mentioned.

Efforts to prohibit transgender adults’ accessibility to wellbeing care lean intensely on claims from so-named “gender-critical” organizations that youthful individuals ought to not be recognized as grownups right before they transform 25, when the human mind is thought to reach entire maturity.

Point out GOP lawmakers in Missouri final year weighed extending a proposed youth health and fitness care ban to grownups below 25, arguing that men and women even into their early 20s are not able to absolutely consent to gender-affirming interventions.

That and similar claims have been disputed by professional medical professionals and doctors with knowledge treating transgender youth, and a number of inquiries have observed that affirming a boy or girl or adolescent’s gender id can boost their mental wellness results into adulthood.

Passing regulations to hold off well being care considered medically essential by most main health-related associations is also dangerous, in accordance to Dr. Meredithe McNamara, an assistant professor of pediatrics at Yale College, and runs the danger of worsening costs of panic, despair and suicidality between transgender youth and youthful grown ups having difficulties with gender dysphoria.

Just about 20 {bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of transgender and nonbinary 13- to 24-year-olds surveyed very last 12 months by The Trevor Project, a main LGBTQ youth suicide avoidance business, reported they had tried suicide in the previous yr. Much less than a 3rd said their gender identity was affirmed at home.

For McNamara, who treats transgender youth aged 11-25, the principal problem with grownup well being care bans lies with folks below 21 — or 26, in Oklahoma’s scenario — who are currently getting gender-affirming health-related treatment.

“There are folks now on therapy, dwelling as their reliable selves and suffering from aid from gender dysphoria who facial area forcible detransition,” she stated.

None of the proposed measures include things like language or provisions that explicitly tackle transgender youth and youthful older people by now obtaining medicines like hormones or puberty blockers.

Attempts to restrict gender-affirming health treatment for grownups also possibility backfiring by restricting the freedoms of people today who can lawfully vote, drink a beer and go to war. They also discriminate centered on sexual intercourse and transgender status, according to Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the American Civil Liberties Union LGBTQ & HIV Venture, generating them unconstitutional.

“It’s not about defending any person,” Strangio claimed of recent legislative attempts to limit gender-affirming care. “It’s about an opposition to trans identification.”

US workers sue Georgia for transgender healthcare discrimination | Gender Equity News

Two state employees and a public school media clerk are suing the state of Georgia in southeast United States, saying state health insurance illegally discriminates by refusing to pay for gender-transition healthcare.

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Atlanta on Wednesday by Micha Rich, Benjamin Johnson and an anonymous state employee suing on behalf of her adult child.

They argue Georgia’s State Health Benefit Plan (SHBP), which insures more than 660,000 state government and public school employees and retirees, is breaking federal law.

“The exclusion not only harms the health and finances of transgender people seeking gender dysphoria treatment, it also reinforces the stigma attached to being transgender, suffering from gender dysphoria and seeking a gender transition,” the lawsuit argues.

“The exclusion communicates to transgender persons and to the public that their state government deems them unworthy of equal treatment.”

The plaintiffs said the exclusion against gender-transition healthcare in the SHBP should be overturned and they should be repaid for the money they spent on procedures not covered by insurance. They have also requested money damages and lawyers’ fees.

The Department of Community Health, which administers the plan, declined comment, according to spokesperson Fiona Roberts.

The lawsuit cites a 2020 Supreme Court ruling that treating someone differently because they are transgender or gay violates a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex. The plaintiffs in that case included an employee of Georgia’s Clayton County.

The suit also argues that Georgia’s actions violate the 14th Amendment’s right to equal protection and that, in the case of Johnson, violate federal prohibitions against sex discrimination in education.

The plaintiffs include three transgender men. Rich is a staff accountant at the Georgia Department of Audits and Accounts. Johnson is a media clerk with the Bibb County School District in Macon. The mother of the third man, identified only as John Doe, is an administrative support worker at the Division of Family and Children Services in suburban Paulding County. She covers Doe, a college student, on her insurance.

All three were assigned as women at birth but transitioned after therapy. All three were seeking top surgery to reduce or remove breasts. All three appealed their denials and won findings from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that Georgia was discriminating against them. The US Department of Justice also started an investigation.

In the meantime, Rich paid $11,200 for his surgery in 2021 and later declared bankruptcy. The Paulding County family paid $8,769 for John Doe’s surgery and is still repaying loans. Both Rich and Doe also say the state owes them for testosterone prescriptions. Johnson dropped his state insurance and bought coverage elsewhere, having surgery in September.

“My employer should not be able to deny me health care because of who I am,” Rich said in a statement. “For years, I had to put off living my life fully while I waited to have the medical treatments that my doctors and I knew I needed.”

The lawsuit is the fourth in a line of lawsuits against Georgian agencies to force them to pay for gender-confirmation surgery and other procedures. State and local governments have lost or settled the previous suits, changing rules to pay for transgender care.

The University System of Georgia paid $100,000 in damages in addition to changing its rules in 2019 when it settled a case brought by a University of Georgia catering manager. A jury in September ordered Georgia’s Houston County to pay $60,000 in damages to a sheriff’s deputy after a federal judge ruled her bosses illegally denied the deputy health coverage for gender-confirmation surgery.

The Department of Community Health agreed to change the rules of Georgia’s Medicaid program in April to settle a lawsuit by two Medicaid beneficiaries.

The Atlanta skyline, featuring Georgia's Capitol dome
State and local governments in Georgia have either lost or settled previous lawsuits pushing for transgender healthcare [File: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters]

The current lawsuit comes as some states seek to ban all gender-confirming care for children. Georgia could consider such a ban next year.

“They did not accept our invitation to negotiate an end to their discrimination without litigation – and, plainly, they didn’t remove the exclusion,” wrote David Brown, legal director at the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs.

In question are two health plans paid for by the state but administered by Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and UnitedHealthcare.

The lawsuit states insurers told the department in 2016 that transgender exclusions were discriminatory. It also says a state lawyer told health plan leadership in July 2020 that a court would likely find the rule illegal.

“Yet the defendants have knowingly and intentionally maintained the exclusion year after year, long after it became plain – and the SBHP itself concluded – that doing so is unlawful discrimination,” the lawsuit states.

A recent court ruling found a similar ban in North Carolina to be illegal. The state is appealing. A Wisconsin ban was overturned in 2018. West Virginia and Iowa have also lost lawsuits over employee coverage, Brown said, while Florida and Arizona are being sued.