Eastern District of Kentucky | Medical Equipment Company Pays $7 Million to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations

LEXINGTON, Ky.— United Seating and Mobility, LLC, d/b/a Numotion (Numotion) has paid $7 million to resolve civil allegations that it made false statements in connection with claims for reimbursement it submitted to Kentucky Medicaid, two of Kentucky Medicaid’s Managed Care Organization contractors (MCOs), MO HealthNet (Missouri Medicaid), and D.C. Medicaid.

Numotion is a national supplier of durable medical equipment (DME), such as hospital beds, manual wheelchairs, power wheelchairs and accessories, and gait trainers.  The investigation involved DME that was “manually priced” by Medicaid payors in Kentucky, Missouri, and D.C.  Those Medicaid programs reimbursed manually priced DME based on the cost Numotion actually paid the manufacturer for the equipment.  Specifically, in Kentucky, reimbursement is based on “a manufacturer’s actual charges” billed to Numotion, or the “invoice price;” in Missouri, reimbursement is based on the “actual invoice of cost;” and in D.C., reimbursement is based on “original documentation reflecting all discounts.”

In the Settlement Agreement, the United States alleged that Numotion did not disclose all discounts Numotion received from, or the cost Numotion actually paid to, DME manufacturers when submitting claims for manually priced DME to Kentucky Medicaid, two Kentucky Medicaid MCOs (Aetna Better Health of Kentucky and WellCare of Kentucky), MO HealthNet, and D.C. Medicaid.  Numotion’s failure to disclose all discounts, or the actual cost paid, resulted in these Medicaid programs paying Numotion higher reimbursements than it was entitled to receive.  The United States contended that the conduct violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(B), a federal law that prohibits knowingly making or using a false statement material to a false claim for reimbursement. 

As part of the settlement, Numotion also entered into a 5-year Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.  The CIA requires, among other things, that Numotion implement a centralized risk assessment program, as part of its compliance program, and hire an Independent Review Organization to complete annual reviews of some of its Medicare and Medicaid claims.

“By hiding or failing to disclose discounts, to receive higher reimbursement from Medicaid programs across the country, Numotion prioritized its financial incentives, to the detriment of these Medicaid programs,” said Carlton S. Shier, IV, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky.  “Whenever the valuable resources of government health care programs are improperly dissipated to those who are not entitled, it diminishes the ability of these programs to meet the needs of their beneficiaries.  We remain committed to doing our part to protect these programs from fraud, waste, and abuse and to preserve the taxpayer money that supports them.”

“When health care companies do not follow federal health care billing requirements, the integrity of those safety net programs can be undermined,” said Special Agent in Charge Tamala E. Miles of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.  “Working with our law enforcement partners, the dedicated work of OIG’s investigators and attorneys has again resulted in the recovery of taxpayer dollars and better protection against improper billing in the future.”

The settlement resolves a lawsuit originally brought by L. Richard Parkey, a former Numotion employee, under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act.  Under those provisions, a private party can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of any recovery. As part of this resolution, Parkey will receive approximately $1.05 million of the settlement amount.

This case was investigated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.  Assistant United States Attorney Jennifer A. Williams handled the matter for the United States.

The case is United States ex rel. L. Richard Parkey v. United Seating and Mobility, LLC d/b/a Numotion, Case No. 3:17-cv-53-GFVT.  The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

 

– END –

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Eastern Pennsylvania

Variables Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Japanese Pennsylvania

MedicalResearch.com Job interview with:

Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Eastern Pennsylvania

Kenya Colvin

Kenya Colvin, MBS
Division of Clinical Instruction
Scranton, PA

MedicalResearch.com:  What is the history for this review? 

Response: Vaccine hesitancy is a major driver of COVID-19 vaccination disparities amongst minority and non-Hispanic White communities. Our target was to have an understanding of what things influenced vaccine hesitancy amid persons in Japanese Pennsylvania to recognize additional effective methods to market vaccine uptake inside minority communities.

MedicalResearch.com:  What are the principal results?

Response: We discovered that the most influential variables on vaccine hesitancy ended up being young than 45 a long time old, figuring out as a minority, staying concerned the COVID-19 vaccine was ineffective, deficiency of information about the vaccine, and believing that an infection with the COVID-19 virus is not major. On the other hand, contrary to similar experiments, our assessment indicated that instruction stage was not a considerable contributor to hesitancy. 

MedicalResearch.com: What should really visitors take away from your report?

Reaction: The COVID-19 vaccines are an successful preventive measure in minimizing danger of difficulties from the constantly evolving COVID-19 virus. Knowledge why African American and Hispanic communities are much more hesitant toward acquiring COVID-19 vaccines and boosters is significant to lowering the COVID-19 relevant health and fitness disparities, such as greater hazard of demise or hospitalization, faced by these communities.

MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for foreseeable future study as a result of this perform?

Response: Our research contained a big proportion of vaccine acceptant and non-Hispanic White participants. To far better fully grasp the drivers of vaccine hesitancy among the minority communities, a a lot more qualified method ought to be utilised to increase participation from vaccine hesitant, minority group customers.

Citation:

Colvin et al. Profiles of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy by race and ethnicity in jap Pennsylvania. PLoS Just one 2023 18(2):e0280245. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36745588/

The information on MedicalResearch.com is supplied for educational purposes only, and is in no way meant to diagnose, remedy, or treat any health care or other problem. Usually request the information of your medical professional or other competent well being and inquire your medical professional any queries you may possibly have concerning a professional medical affliction. In addition to all other restrictions and disclaimers in this settlement, assistance service provider and its third celebration providers disclaim any legal responsibility or loss in relationship with the content material offered on this web page.

&#13
288&#13