Cardiovascular Research Foundation Announces Clinical Trials Center Executive Director

December 30, 2022 — The Cardiovascular Exploration Foundation (CRF) lately declared that Alexandra Popma, MD, has joined the group as Executive Director of the CRF Medical Trials Heart (CTC).  A distinguished researcher with more than 20 a long time of encounter, Popma will come to CRF from The Baim Institute for Clinical Exploration, a whole-support nonprofit educational analysis group in Boston, exactly where she served as Chief Functioning Officer, according to the CRF assertion on the appointment. As Govt Director of the CRF Medical Trials Center (CTC), she assumes accountability for the strategic route, administration, and operational areas of the CTC, doing the job intently with all CTC departments to guarantee that the division carries on to produce excellent study products and services.

Prior to joining CRF, Popma was also the Director of the Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory at Harvard Clinical College Physicians at Beth Israel Deaconess Professional medical Centre in Boston. Below her management, the main laboratory made revolutionary techniques for the analyses of cardiovascular imaging to superior recognize the outcomes of people undergoing new device remedy. She acquired her clinical degree from University del Rosario in Bogotá, Colombia.

“I am quite psyched to sign up for the CRF Clinical Trials Centre,” explained Dr. Popma, adding, “CRF is an organization with an impeccable track record for innovation in cardiovascular drugs and client care…working closely with CRF’s environment-renowned medical professional management, I hope to bolster the CTC’s knowledge in clinical demo design and style and growth.”

CRF management supplied the pursuing on the addition of Popma to the CRF crew:

“We are delighted to welcome Alexandra to CRF,” claimed Juan Granada, MD, CRF’s President and Main Govt Officer. He extra, “Dr. Popma’s unique track record and encounter will strengthen CRF’s investigate group and our abilities to take a look at the scientific overall performance of emerging cardiovascular technologies. She is a widely highly regarded medical professional whose management and experience will develop our latest research abilities and providers to our sponsors.”

“Alexandra Popma is a impressive leader and is uniquely capable to presume the part as Government Director of the CTC,” stated Martin B. Leon, MD, CRF Founder and Chairman Emeritus. “She has the expertise, knowledge, decisiveness, arms-on motivation to detail, and advancement-oriented persona to aid guide the CTC to unparalleled heights in the potential. We are so lucky to have Alexandra be a part of CRF in this very important management place,” included Leon.

The Cardiovascular Investigation Foundation (CRF) is a nonprofit corporation specializing in interventional cardiology innovation, exploration, and education. CRF is committed to assisting medical doctors make improvements to survival and top quality of lifestyle for folks struggling from heart and vascular disease. The corporation notes that it has aided speed up professional medical breakthroughs and educated medical practitioners on the most recent treatments for coronary heart sickness for about 30 a long time. CRF’s centers of excellence include things like the CRF Skirball Center for Innovation, CRF Scientific Trials Heart, CRF Heart for Education, CRF Digital, TCTMD, and Structural Heart: The Journal of the Coronary heart Group.

Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) is the yearly scientific symposium of CRF and the leading educational conference specializing in interventional cardiovascular medicine. TCT attributes main healthcare research breakthroughs and gathers primary scientists and clinicians from about the world to existing and focus on the latest proof-based mostly analysis in the subject.

For far more information: www.crf.org

For linked coverage of TCT: https://www.dicardiology.com/channel/tct

Clinical Trials for Kidney Cancer: What to Know

It is lucky that, in a the vast majority of circumstances, kidney most cancers is caught in advance of spreading to other parts of the entire body. For these clients, remedy commonly requires a nephrectomy, which is the surgical elimination of one particular or the two of the kidneys. The objective of the surgery is to reduce the cancer from metastasizing. Regretably, a lot of individuals who endure a nephrectomy for substantial-threat disease—between 20{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} to 50{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}, according to current estimates—will inevitably go on to develop metastatic most cancers.

Till recently, there wasn’t a lot a person’s treatment team could do in this problem to halt the cancer from coming back again. Reliably powerful “adjuvant” immune therapies—something extra to operation to reduce the cancer’s return—had not nonetheless been discovered. But in 2021, the New England Journal of Medication revealed the results of a groundbreaking medical demo. The demo involved approximately 1,000 men and women undergoing nephrectomy who were being at high possibility for cancer recurrence. About 50 percent of the people today took a placebo capsule, even though the other fifty percent took a kidney cancer drug termed pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor—a kind of immunotherapy drug that stimulates the immune technique to combat cancer cells. After two several years of stick to-up, the individuals in the demo who took the immunotherapy drug were being considerably fewer possible to have had a most cancers recurrence than those having the placebo. A handful of months later, the U.S. Foodstuff and Drug Administration (Fda) approved pembrolizumab as a sort of adjuvant treatment.

“This was a gain-win circumstance,” claims Dr. Toni Choueiri, one of the leaders of that trial and director of the Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at the Dana-Farber Most cancers Institute in Boston. Not only did the individuals included in the demo reward from the drug, but the experiment’s conclusions also served grow the health-related community’s know-how of the disorder and its arsenal of weapons.

Clinical trials like the one Choueiri led are occurring all the time throughout the region. They are a essential step—and normally the final step—in the advancement of new medications for the cure of kidney cancer. But they don’t usually entail medications. Scientific trials are also utilized to vet the usefulness of new surgical strategies, new diagnostic techniques, and everything else that could improve the life of folks with kidney cancer. Even though some trials break new floor, many others take a look at modest modifications to the existing requirements of care—such as changing the dose of a drug up or down, or switching the way remedy facet-results are managed. In all conditions, a trial’s outcomes support shape the way each individual human being who develops kidney most cancers is handled, and so their value are not able to be overstated.

In this article, Choueiri and other kidney cancer experts element the most current developments in the trial landscape. They also explain who is suitable to participate in scientific trials, how enrollment in a trial will work, and how trials have served revolutionize the subject of kidney most cancers medicine.

Mapping the latest demo landscape

Kidney most cancers doesn’t respond nicely to typical most cancers solutions, such as standard radiation or chemotherapy. As not too long ago as 2005, there was only 1 style of medication—an immunotherapy drugs known as interleukin-2—that had Fda approval for the curative cure of kidney cancer.

Fortunately, the predicament today is a great deal distinctive. “We now have additional than a dozen Food and drug administration-accepted prescription drugs, and each single one of them has been approved and is available simply because of randomized clinical trials,” claims Dr. James Brugarolas, director of the Kidney Most cancers Plan at the University of Texas Southwestern Healthcare Centre in Dallas.

Brugarolas is associated in translational exploration, which aims to carry scientific discoveries manufactured in the lab or in animal designs into the realm of human medication. Some of his modern work has concerned a transcription component referred to as HIF-2. A transcription issue is basically a protein molecule that controls the activity of a gene, and HIF-2 regulates a gene that influences the advancement of kidney cancer tumors. For many years, there was speculation that blocking the exercise of HIF-2 could prevent or slow the development of kidney cancer. Having said that, for the reason that of HIF-2’s unusual structure, normal medications could not bind to it. HIF-2 was essentially “undruggable,” Brugarolas suggests. But quite a few yrs back, scientists at UT Southwestern recognized a cavity in an HIF-2 protein that could be exploited with specifically created prescription drugs. Brugarolas has served create those people medications, which are known as HIF-2 inhibitors, and a sequence of scientific trials has demonstrated that they are efficient for several sorts of kidney most cancers. “Very handful of cancer drugs focus on transcription elements, so this is a new paradigm,” he states.

Brugarolas notes that medical trials on HIF-2 inhibitors are ongoing, and equivalent trials are wanting at several other novel drug solutions. Like other types of cancer, kidney most cancers isn’t really a single sickness, he states. It’s extra exact to get in touch with it a family members of connected cancers that have various traits. Some of his other operate, which includes scientific trials he’s led, has examined these attributes to decide how specific individual groups will react to sure therapies.

Though some scientific trials look at groundbreaking new remedies, other people entail new cocktails of existing medicines. This sort of “combination therapy” is an in particular active place of kidney most cancers research, says Dr. Eric Jonasch, a kidney most cancers professional and professor of genitourinary medical oncology at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. A handful of combos have now acquired Fda approval. “More mixtures are coming down the pipeline, and not just doublets, but triplets.”

Not all the demo operate is anxious with drug therapies. “There have been advancements in surgical methods, this kind of as robotic surgery,” Jonasch says. A specialised style of radiation remedy is a different promising place of investigate. “The capacity to emphasis radiation even though reducing collateral problems has drastically improved,” he says. Radiation could offer advancements more than broader “systemic” remedies for folks with kidney cancers that have metastasized. “It could even take care of kidney tumors by themselves with no surgery,” he adds.

The added benefits of all this trial perform are significant—and quantifiable. “Kidney cancer is a condition wherever, it’s possible 15 many years back, somebody identified with phase 4 condition experienced just one year to reside, and now the typical is nearer to five several years,” Choueiri says. The following ten years is guaranteed to provide far more considerable enhancements in the lives and longevity of people with kidney most cancers. But to get there, clinical trials will need contributors.

Study Additional: Coping With the Facet Results of Kidney-Cancer Procedure

The benefits of participating in a scientific trial

The exact hazards and rewards of scientific demo participation will differ from a person patient—and trial—to the subsequent. But broadly speaking, industry experts say there are two powerful good reasons for people with kidney most cancers to acquire element in this type of clinical study.

“Number 1, demo participation could give sufferers the possibility to access therapies that may well not if not be accessible to them,” Jonasch states. In just about all instances, the price of these therapies—which can be considerable—will be picked up by the providers or institutions operating the demo.

For these who may well be concerned about hoping an experimental therapy, Jonasch claims that each individual scientific trial must be accredited by a review board—an unaffiliated group of gurus who scrutinize the proposed demo to make certain that individuals are not exposed to undue challenges. “Because of how ethical boards perform today, you’re incredibly likely heading to get anything that is both equivalent or exceptional to regular treatment,” he states. Research in the Journal of the National Most cancers Institute has identified that individuals with cancer who participate in clinical trials are inclined to fare slightly much better than people who really do not. Primarily for individuals with innovative cancers with a very poor prognosis, demo participation can be beneficial, that research located.

It is not an exaggeration to say that having aspect in a clinical trial has intended the variation between existence and dying for some individuals. “I have a good deal of patients who were being concerned in scientific trials of tiny-molecule [drugs] or immunotherapies who, if they experienced gotten the normal of treatment back again then, would not be alive correct now,” Choueiri says.

A further gain to demo participation is the impression its conclusions have on the cancer local community. “You’re contributing to the growth of our expertise of the ailment, and you are serving to in the growth of therapies that will advantage other individuals,” Jonasch states.

One particular of the tragedies of most cancers is that, in many situations, it robs the earth of all the fantastic someone may have carried out experienced their existence not been disrupted or minimize limited by the disorder. “For quite a few people, everyday living has been drastically undermined by cancer, and they might appreciate the possibility to support other people today who have the identical condition,” Brugarolas suggests.

Study A lot more: The Newest Breakthroughs That Could Increase Kidney Most cancers Treatment method

How to just take section in a scientific demo

The initial action is to request your treatment group if you may well be a good prospect for a scientific demo, Choueiri says. Referral from a cancer expert or physician is the most popular route to demo enrollment.

Even so, you may well also have to do a very little study on your personal. “The whole field of oncology, not just kidney cancer, is growing at a charge where by it’s really hard to know every little thing which is going on,” Choueiri claims. If you’re not becoming treated at a big analysis hospital or health and fitness method, your treatment staff may possibly not be knowledgeable of trials that could benefit you.

There are a wide range of ways to discover trials on your possess. “Visit ClinicalTrials.gov,” Jonasch suggests. This is a thorough databases of medical trials having place in the U.S. and in other sections of the globe. You can lookup it dependent on your style of most cancers and your spot, and it could aid you discover trials that are worth flagging to your medical practitioners.

Jonasch also suggests connecting with kidney most cancers patient advocacy corporations, these kinds of as the Kidney Most cancers Association and the International Kidney Cancer Coalition, to check with about medical trials. “These teams can be a tremendous source for navigating these waters,” he claims.

At last, he claims there is an especially wonderful need to have for more demo participation among the men and women of shade, who are not often properly represented in this perform. He blames complications of obtain and recruitment for these shortfalls. “We’re not acquiring it appropriate but, but there are endeavours underway to assure we’re achieving out to communities that may perhaps not have obtain to medical trials,” he claims. “It’s incredibly crucial that we have consultant diversity to assure we recognize the effects in all client teams.”

Plainly, there’s a lot likely on in the demo area for kidney cancer. It is a risk-free wager that additional breakthroughs could soon adhere to.

Far more Have to-Reads From TIME


Make contact with us at letters@time.com.

Clinical trials demonstrate safety and efficacy of Ebola Zaire vaccines

Two vaccines in opposition to the Zaire pressure of Ebola virus are immunogenic and protected in both of those grownups and small children, in accordance to first outcomes from two period II clinical trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Advert26.ZEBOV (Ad26) followed by MVA-BN-Filo (MVA) 56 days later on and rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP (rVSV) given with or without a booster dose 56 days later manufactured antibody responses as early as two weeks adhering to administration of the to start with dose of vaccine which lasted for at least one particular yr.

Both vaccine regimens had been harmless and effectively-tolerated.

These results, unveiled as element of the PREVAC examine in West Africa, may help optimize vaccine procedures to fight Ebola virus disease (EVD), and limit the significant demise rates connected with outbreaks of the Zaire pressure.

PREVAC (Partnership for Investigation on Ebola Vaccinations) is a consortium of health and fitness authorities in four nations in West Africa — Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Mali — performing together with global husband or wife corporations such as the London School of Cleanliness & Tropical Medication (LSHTM), the U.S. Nationwide Institutes of Health and fitness and the French National Institute of Well being and Health care Analysis.

Launched in 2017, the PREVAC review aims to compare the security and efficacy of a few unique experimental regimens of Ebola Zaire vaccine vs . placebo.

Over-all, 2801 volunteers at six web sites in Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Mali, had been recruited into two, randomized period II clinical trials: one involving 1400 grown ups (median age of 27 yrs, 45{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} females) and the other involving 1401 small children aged one year or older (median age of 8 many years, 46{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} feminine).

Participants been given possibly Ad26 (provided by Janssen) followed by MVA (provided by Bavarian Nordic) eight months afterwards, one particular dose of rVSV (equipped by Merck Sharp & Dohme) followed by placebo 8 weeks afterwards, or two doses of rVSV divided by 8 months.

Regimens of Advert26 furthermore MVA and rVSV generated antibody responses in individuals from 7 days two subsequent to start with injection. Peak response prices happened at close to month three for Advertisement26 as well as MVA in grown ups and children, at day 28 for rVSV in grownups and youngsters in the one dose group and at day 63 in older people and youngsters in the rVSV booster team. By 12 months, antibody responses had been still perfectly taken care of in all teams.

Reported facet effects, these kinds of as fever and complications, ended up gentle, short-term and very similar to prior vaccine scientific tests.

Despite the fact that the findings are promising, the authors emphasize that they were being not able to assess how these vaccines could possibly safeguard towards EVD instantly as no situations of the disorder had been recorded in the demo and the actual level of antibody response necessary to induce protecting immunity is however not known.

&#13

Extended-time period abide by up of the individuals in this trial is having put to identify if and when booster doses might be wanted. The availability of secure and efficient Ebola vaccines for both equally children and grownups is an vital stage ahead in becoming ready to avert and/or incorporate upcoming outbreaks of Ebola infection.”

&#13
&#13

Professor Brian Greenwood, Co-Creator and Professor of Scientific Tropical Drugs, LSHTM

&#13

Remember to notice that the vaccines investigated in PREVAC are against the Zaire pressure of Ebola virus and not the Sudan pressure implicated in the present-day outbreak in Uganda.

Further facts on the PREVAC Consortium can be uncovered listed here. A stick to-up analyze, PREVAC-UP, will go on to watch individuals over a 5-year interval to evaluate whether or not these original protection and efficacy final results can be maintained in the very long-expression.

Resource:

Journal reference:

Kieh, M., et al. (2022) Randomized trial of vaccines for Zaire Ebola virus disorder. New England Journal of Medication. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2200072.

Large-scale review of COVID-19 clinical trials highlights multiple disparities

Large-scale review of COVID-19 clinical trials highlights multiple disparities
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Women were underrepresented in COVID-19 treatment clinical trials, and some racial and ethnic groups were underrepresented in COVID-19 prevention trials, according to a new meta-analysis conducted by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in collaboration with researchers from Beijing and London.

The study, published Dec. 5 in JAMA Internal Medicine, identified system-wide differences in representation among several key demographic groups in COVID-19 prevention and treatment trials in the U.S.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to comprehensively examine demographic representation across the landscape of both COVID-19 prevention and treatment trials over the first two years of this pandemic,” said Hong Xiao, Ph.D., researcher in the Public Health Sciences Division at Fred Hutch and the lead author for the study.

By the numbers

Overall, the meta-analysis examined 122 U.S.-based clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines or treatments, involving more than 175,000 participants. The selected trials were those registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or published in PubMed from October 2019 to February 2022.

Only studies that provided data about enrolled participants by sex, race or ethnicity were analyzed in this study. Representation rates from trials were compared to expected rates in the U.S. COVID-19 population.

Takeaways

Key findings from their review included:

  • Sex, race, and ethnicity were reported in 89.3{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}, 77.9{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}, and 71.3{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of U.S.-based COVID-19 clinical trials, respectively, suggesting there was a meaningful gap for many studies in this important aspect of trial reporting.
  • Female participants were underrepresented in treatment trials (85{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of expected participants) but were well represented in COVID-19 prevention trials.
  • Black and Asian individuals were underrepresented in COVID-19 prevention trials (53.7{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} and 64.4{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of expected participants, respectively), but were well represented in COVID-19 treatment trials.
  • Hispanic individuals were overrepresented in treatment trials (more than 200{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} of expected participants).

Author commentary

The study authors noted that female participants historically have been underrepresented in clinical trials in general for various reasons. Pregnant women have routinely been excluded from clinical trials; as such, women of reproductive age may have had greater concerns about how developmental COVID-19 treatments would affect their health and current or future fertility.

The authors also speculated that Hispanic overrepresentation might have occurred for several reasons, including the fact that one-third of the U.S.-based COVID-19 trial sites were in California, Texas and Florida—areas with large Hispanic populations. Additionally, COVID-19 treatment trials were typically conducted among inpatient populations, which may have disproportionately affected Hispanic populations due to a lack of primary care and increased risk for COVID-associated hospitalizations.

“In many instances, our findings highlight achievements in the successful enrollment of historically underrepresented patients. However, our findings also underscore that despite efforts to eliminate sex, racial and ethnic disparities, gaps in reporting and differences in representation in U.S.-based COVID-19 trials have persisted,” said Joseph M. Unger, Ph.D., MS, Fred Hutch biostatistician and health services researcher and the study’s senior author. “Clearly, more progress needs to occur to fully close these gaps and achieve greater diversity among participants.”

Equitable access

“This vital work by Fred Hutch researchers and their collaborators highlights the ongoing disparities in who accesses and enrolls in clinical research,” added Rachel Bender Ignacio, MD, medical director of the COVID-19 Clinical Research Center at Fred Hutch. “We must remain laser-focused on ensuring that clinical-trial participation is representative of the general population, which both requires trust in and access to research, and also ensures that the products of that research are acceptable to and appropriate for everyone.”

Xiao, Unger and the rest of the study authors concluded that additional strategies are needed to ensure that all trial sponsors, whether federally supported or industry-funded, are held accountable for appropriate representation of females and racial and ethnic groups in clinical trials.

More information:
Hong Xiao et al, JAMA Internal Medicine (2022). DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5600

Provided by
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Citation:
Large-scale review of COVID-19 clinical trials highlights multiple disparities (2022, December 5)
retrieved 5 December 2022
from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-12-large-scale-covid-clinical-trials-highlights.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

A Guide to Becoming a Clinical Research Nurse

A Guide to Becoming a Clinical Research Nurse

Courtesy of Getty Images

Maybe you’re a nurse who would also like to be more involved in the clinical research process. Or maybe you’re a nurse who also wants to ensure the highest standard of care for patients in research trials. 

If either of these things are true for you, then you might have what it takes to become a clinical research nurse. 

Clinical research nurses are an integral part of the research process. They are essentially the managers of the most important part of any medical research: the trial patients themselves. 

The role can be very rewarding, both mentally and financially. It’s not without its challenges, however, and that is something everyone who wants to be a  clinical research nurse should take into account.

To help with this decision, BioSpace has outlined the role of a clinical research nurse, its ups and downs, and what it takes to become part of this crucial role.

What is a Clinical Research Nurse?

A clinical research nurse is responsible for the direct care of patients who are participants in clinical trials. These trials could involve anything from testing new treatments to researching novel approaches to human health.

The clinical research nurse is responsible for administering treatment, collecting data from test results and ensuring that the care, best interests and confidentiality of their patients are maintained at all times. 

In this way, the role seems similar to that of a traditional nurse. There are a few key differences, however. The role of the clinical research nurse also involves: 

  1. Greater involvement in the research process. A clinical research nurse may be involved in designing the actual clinical trial. He or she may also be asked to help design patient protocols for future trials as well. The clinical research nurse may also be involved in the initial screening process for selecting patients for trials. 

  2. An understanding of how clinical research works. A clinical research nurse requires in-depth knowledge of the clinical research process itself. This means he or she must understand how trials are designed, how treatments are administered and how conclusions are drawn from the results. 

  3. Maintaining confidentiality of both the patient and the project. In addition to maintaining the confidentiality of their patients, the clinical research nurse must also maintain the confidentiality of the entire research project as well. 

Clinical research nurses may work out of typical nursing settings, such as hospitals and long-term care facilities. However, they are just as likely to work out of biotech laboratories or university research centers. Depending on the type of study, their patients may be day patients or inpatients at various care centers. 

Pros of Becoming a Clinical Research Nurse

  1. It’s an integral role in developing better patient care. Clinical research nurses are involved with more than the care of their patients. They’re also helping to develop new treatments and better research that could one day help future patients. For this reason, clinical research nurses usually find their work very rewarding.  

  1. Compensation is competitive. Clinical research nurses often receive higher salaries than traditional nurses. While the median annual salary of a registered nurse in the US is $ 93,089, the median annual salary of a clinical research nurse is $116,2992.  

  1. The need for clinical research nurses will continue to grow. As the US population ages, the need for more medical research will increase.  This means the need for more clinical research nurses will increase as well.  Anyone with the qualifications to become a clinical research nurse should have no trouble finding work. 

Cons of Becoming a Clinical Research Nurse

  1. Patient advocacy may be a source of stress. In clinical research situations, the pressure may be on to ensure the research can be completed on time. In these cases, the clinical research nurse may need to step up and speak on behalf of their patients. 

  2. Drugs administered are not always FDA-approved. Because clinical research nurses work in clinical trials, many of the drugs they administer to patients may be experimental. Someone who is not comfortable with this may want to consider a different career. 

Regardless of the impact on the study itself, the clinical research nurse’s patients must be their top priority. If patient advocacy is not a source of stress for you, then this should be of little to no issue. 

Necessary Skills and Experience

The basic requirements of a clinical research nurse are similar to traditional nurses. A bachelor’s degree in nursing, biology or a similar discipline is required. Most job postings require a current state license as a registered nurse as well. 

Many clinical research centers require at least some experience in a research setting. This can be gained by applying for roles as a clinical research assistant first. Once enough experience is gained in this type of role, nurses can apply for clinical research nursing positions. 

Nurses may also want to consider earning a master’s of science in nursing in order to qualify for top-paying clinical research nursing positions. 

Clinical research companies also look for several crucial soft skills. Good communication skills, the ability to be well-organized at all times and an innate sense of ethics are all important in a clinical nursing role. 

Taking the Next Step

If you’re a caring and compassionate nurse who also has a strong desire to improve medical care for the future, then a role as a clinical research nurse may be the perfect fit for you. 

If you’re ready to start applying, be sure to check out BioSpace’s current job postings for clinical research nurses.

Circuit Clinical and Middletown Medical Partner to Expand Access to Clinical Research for 100K+ Patients in the Hudson Valley

BUFFALO, N.Y., Nov. 29, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Circuit Clinical—one of the nation’s fastest growing integrated research organizations—has expanded their presence in the Hudson Valley region through a partnership with Middletown Medical, a top tier, multi-specialty physician group, increasing access to clinical research as a care option to an additional 100,000 patients that Middletown Medical serves. This partnership will bring trials to a more diverse patient population—comprised of approximately 50{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} non-white individuals.

The breadth of Middletown Medical’s primary and specialty care, combined with Circuit’s commitment to improving patient access and inclusion in clinical trials, will bring new care opportunities to Middletown’s patients through the provider relationships they already trust – further positioning the region as a destination for medical research and advancements. This partnership will initially include 11 Principal Investigators, participating in specialties such as, but not limited to, cardiology, rheumatology, neurology, gastroenterology, and family medicine.

“Patient care is a top priority for Middletown Medical and we are committed to providing any and all opportunities to our physicians and the communities they serve,” said Dr Rajan Gulati, President of Middletown Medical.

Middletown Medical and Circuit Clinical are committed to reducing the burden on patients who opt in for research participation. Along with localizing patient care within the Middletown Medical physicians’ offices, Circuit’s approach to transforming the patient journey includes hybrid care options through telemedicine, fully decentralized trial solutions, as well as trialjourney.com—an award-winning patient experience platform for finding trials and leaving site ratings and reviews to improve the experience of participating in clinical trials. This variety of care options can help eliminate traditional care obstacles that have created a burden for patients to participate in clinical research. Furthermore, patient participation in research will serve to benefit both individuals and communities, including offering extra care visits without co-pays, strengthening the patient-provider relationship, and often leading to improved health outcomes through a better and more personal care experience.

This collaboration was made possible through strategic partnerships with Labcorp—a leading global life sciences company that provides vital information to help doctors, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, researchers, and patients make clear and confident decisions—as well as Medidata—a Dassault Systems company that is powering smarter treatments and healthier people with the world’s most trusted platform for clinical development, commercial, and real-world data.

“We are beyond excited to expand our national research network through amazing partnerships like this one with Middletown Medical,” said Irfan Khan, MD, CEO of Circuit Clinical. “Together we can empower patients to engage with clinical trials as a care option. The combined efforts of Circuit Clinical and our strategic partners, Labcorp and Medidata, allow us to make partnerships like this with Middletown Medical not only a reality, but as optimal and innovative as possible.”

About Middletown Medical

Middletown Medical is a multi-specialty physicians’ group dedicated to providing patients with top quality, comprehensive care in a warm and caring environment which delivers care to over 100,000 patients throughout Orange, Sullivan, and Ulster counties in New York state. Please access Middletownmedical.com to learn more about their doctors and the expansive scope of services provided.

About Circuit Clinical

Circuit Clinical®, one of the fastest-growing integrated research organizations in the USA, is dedicated to empowering patients to choose clinical research as a care option. Circuit is committed to transforming the experience for physicians and their patients of finding, choosing, and participating in clinical research. The company delivers clinical research services and an award-winning patient engagement platform, trialjourney.com. Learn more at circuitclinical.com and follow along for updates and announcements on LinkedIn.

For additional questions or inquiries, please contact the following:

Circuit Clinical

Candice Kent
VP of Marketing and Communications
[email protected]

Middletown Medical

Darcy Shepard
CEO, Middletown Medical
[email protected] 

SOURCE Circuit Clinical