Amazon makes a new push into health care

AS BIG tech companies face a brutal slow-down the hunt is on for new areas of expansion. Amazon, which is now America’s second-biggest business by revenue, is a case in point. In the final quarter of 2022 its sales are expected to expand by just 6.7{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} year on year. On November 17th Andy Jassy, Amazon’s chief executive, confirmed that the firm had begun laying off employees and would fire more next year. Mr Jassy said it was the most difficult decision he had made since becoming boss. But he also noted that “big opportunities” lay ahead. One that he highlighted is the largest, most lucrative and hellishly difficult businesses in America: health care.

Many tech firms have health-care ambitions. Apple tracks wellbeing through the iPhone; Microsoft offers cloud-computing services to health firms and Alphabet sells wearable devices and is pumping money into biotech research. But Amazon is now creating the most ambitious offering of all. Two days before Mr Jassy’s statement, on November 15th, it launched “Amazon Clinic”, an online service operating in 32 states that offers virtual health care for over 20 conditions, from acne to allergies. Amazon describes the new service as a virtual storefront that connects users with third-party health providers.

Amazon makes a new push into health care

The Amazon Clinic launch follows the $3.9bn takeover, announced in July, of One Medical, a primary-care provider that offers telehealth services and runs bricks-and-mortar clinics (the deal has yet to close). It has 790,000 members. The deal was led by Neil Lindsay, formerly responsible for Prime, Amazon’s subscription service, who has said health care “is high on the list of experiences that need reinvention”.

These latest moves complement Amazon’s existing assets. Its Halo band, a wearable device that went on sale in 2020, monitors the health status of users. In 2018 it bought PillPack, a digital pharmacy that is now part of Amazon Pharmacy, for $753m. Amazon Web Services launched specific cloud services for health care and life science companies in 2021.

The move into primary care, jargon for the role of the traditional family doctor, is a big step but has an obvious logic. Walgreens, a pharmacy chain, reckons the industry is worth $1trn a year. Around half of Generation Z and millennial Americans do not have a primary-care doctor and One Medical’s membership has almost doubled since 2019. Amazon Clinic will accept cash for its services, rather than relying on America’s nightmare insurance system to recoup costs.

The company is betting that primary care will become more digital. And it is likely that it will seek to integrate these services with other parts of Amazon’s health-care offering. Amazon Clinic’s new users can buy drugs from Amazon Pharmacy. Over time the firm could add a feature to the Halo band reminding users to take medicine. It might also set up clinics in branches of Whole Foods, the supermarket chain it acquired in 2017. And it may wrap health care into Prime, which now has some 200m members worldwide. “The low-hanging fruit is offering discounts on membership to Prime members,” says Daniel Grosslight of Citigroup, a bank.

Amazon’s health push comes with several risks. One is that its own record is far from flawless. It is closing Amazon Care, which it launched to provide health services for its own employees and which expanded to offer some services to outside customers. Haven—a collaboration with Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett’s investment firm, and JPMorgan Chase, a bank—was set up in 2018 to procure lower cost health care for employees, but died less than three years later.

Another danger is competition. cvs, an American retail pharmacy, reportedly outbid Amazon for Signify Health, a large primary-care provider in September. In October, Walgreens increased its stake in Villagemd with a $5.2bn investment. JPMorgan recently opened primary-care centres of its own. Amazon’s new venture will also compete with the likes of Ro and Hims & Hers, tech startups dedicated to providing virtual health care.

Finally, Amazon will have to grapple with regulators. The Federal Trade Commission, a trust-busting agency, is examining the One Medical deal. The takeover, and the launch of Amazon Clinic, will raise questions about who should be allowed to hold sensitive health-care data. Amazon has said “we remain focused on the important mission of protecting customers’ health information”. The firm may need to set up hefty firewalls to separate customer information held by clinics from that gathered through other products and services. But satisfying data-privacy concerns could wipe out many of the data-sharing opportunities that Amazon deftly deploys across the rest of its business.

Amazon’s attempts at disrupting health care will be subject to intense scrutiny. Nonetheless it should have a positive effect on health care in America. Its experience at keeping customers happy while generating razor-thin margins could improve primary care and force other providers to up their game. It may also prompt other tech giants to do more to disrupt health care themselves. All this may be just the medicine that America’s heath-care system—and Mr Jassy’s tenure as Amazon’s boss—badly need.■

8 Best Health and Wellness Podcasts

Viewpoints expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

In 2020, I shared 11 podcasts all over health and fitness and wellness to aid keep entrepreneurs calm and influenced in the thick of the COVID-19 pandemic. I tend to pay attention to podcasts on walks, when doing the job out, while cooking and even although driving. Whilst I delight in a lot of of the extra proven podcasts these types of as Jay Shetty, Dr. Mark Hyman and TED Well being, under I share 8 of the more recent and most instructive podcasts and hosts that are on the increase. If you happen to be looking for inspiration, education, and actionable guidelines to level up your health and fitness, check out out just one or a several of the demonstrates under.

1. Huberman Lab

Huberman Lab is hosted by Dr. Andrew Huberman, Ph.D., and tenured Professor in the Section of Neurobiology at the Stanford University Faculty of Medicine. Although this just one can get nitty gritty on brain operate and science, Dr. Huberman’s knows how to simplify his content and crack it down into very “digestible” bites of info. His podcast is ranked in the Top rated 25 of all podcasts globally and is generally rated #1 in the Science, Instruction and Health and fitness & Health groups. Some fascinating exhibits of Dr. Huberman’s contain Heat & Sauna for Overall health, Alcoholic beverages and Your Overall health, Great Your Sleep and Enrich Your Immune System. If you happen to be curious, test the Bonus Episode from August 17, 2022 which is a are living function where by Dr. Huberman responses questions about his possess supplements regime, how social media is altering our brains, ice baths and his favourite mind hacks for carrying out really hard things.

Related: Aid Particular Well being and Wellness With Your On the web Calendar

2. The Gabby Reece Display

The Gabby Reece Show is hosted by Gabrielle Reece, Olympic volleyball legend, New York Periods greatest-providing author, corporate speaker, mom and wife to huge-wave surfer Laird Hamilton. I know Gabby individually and will attest that she is just as authentic, raw and real in man or woman as she is on her exhibits. Gabby speaks with foremost gurus in wellness and conditioning, but she also goes deep into relationships, together with the kinds with her husband and two daughters. Also a previous product and entrepreneur (she co-established two firms with her husband), Gabby dives into the hardships of parenting, entrepreneurship, adversity and numerous enterprise-relevant matters. She speaks from the heart and hopes to enlighten listeners with actionable takeaways.

3. The Art of Currently being Perfectly With Dr. Will Cole

The Artwork of Being Very well with Dr. Will Cole launched in January of 2021 and is already one particular of the leaders in the house. Dr. Cole, DNM, IFMCP, DC is a primary practical medicine expert who introduced 1 of the to start with practical drugs telehealth centers in the planet. From intermittent fasting to hormone imbalances to autoimmune problems and far more, Dr. Cole believes “wellness is a sacred artwork” and this is expressed in the lightness and grace with which he strategies wellness. Dr. Cole enjoys his peanut butter and treats and even offers a more healthy liquor guide for his lovers, as he far too, enjoys his occasional cocktail or glass of wine. Also a New York Periods most effective-advertising author, he most just lately introduced “Intestine Emotions: Healing The Shame Fueled Partnership Among What You Try to eat and How You Really feel.” If you might be not sure of the place to get started and can relate to Peloton, I liked episode 114 from September 5th, 2022 with Rebecca Kennedy. You may possibly just be offering pilates a test!

Related: 4 Actions to Take as an Entrepreneur When the Heading Gets Tough

4. The Dr. Gabrielle Lyon Clearly show

The Dr. Gabrielle Lyon Exhibit is hosted by Washington College fellowship-properly trained health practitioner who operates with audiences, which include Navy SEALs teams, Eco-friendly Berets, Military Rangers and other Unique Operations Armed service. I have had the pleasure of connecting with Dr. Lyon and she’s a prosperity of information on all things rate of metabolism, strength and energy. Mainly because of her, I take in considerably more protein than I employed to. Her methodology is Muscle-Centric Medicineâwhich is built to strengthen muscle mass overall health as a result of a protein clever food plan, ensuing in very long-term health and fitness, restoring the metabolism, body weight loss, greater power and amplified electrical power. If you might be skeptical, down load her free guidebook to her Lyon Protocol or have a hear to one of her exhibits. Introduced in Could of 2022, this show has quickly climbed the Apple Podcast scores and Dr. Lyons has been a visitor on various podcasts and Tv Reveals. She believes muscle tissue travel the metabolic rate and are the important to lifestyle-prolonged fat decline.

5. Redefining Yoga by LYT Yoga

Redefining Yoga by LYT Yoga has 4.9 out of 5 stars simply because it truly is, that very good. Think about if Yoga and Bodily Remedy acquired married and experienced a little one. Which is exactly what Lara Heimann made with LYT Yoga which she refers to as “Smart Yoga Formulated By a Physical Therapist.” I know Lara, have taken various of her courses and have turn out to be a change simply because this style of yoga has aided me shift much better and really feel improved. With a BA from Duke University, an MS in Actual physical Therapy, also from Duke and a Neurodevelopment Teaching Certificate by way of Stanford University, Lara teaches us about overall body consciousness and mechanics that most yoga tactics do not cover. Her solo episodes and company talk about matters across thoughts and entire body link, smarter motion styles, the braveness to transform, self-control and self-confidence to pursue your ambitions.

6. The Exceptional Overall body Podcast

The Exceptional System Podcast delivers human body strategies and written content to support us much better fully grasp our bodies, alleviate suffering and limitations and understand what “best” signifies in our possess bodies. Co-hosted by just one of the best actual physical therapists in the US, Dr. Jen Esquer, this present is a go-to resource spanning throughout tight hips, office ergonomics, creaky knees, foot mobility and how diet and breathwork connect to all of this. I personally use Dr. Jen’s mobility application as a daily software for pre-exercise routine warm-ups, center-of-day mobility, main stabilization and breathwork. As practical and powerful as her 7-20 moment mobility routines are, the podcasts abide by a identical bite-size format, delivered in charismatic voices akin to speaking with superior friends. Dr. Jen and her co-host husband, Dr. Dominic share their possess actual physical difficulties and constraints although educating us on how to be a lot more well balanced, whether or not therapeutic massage treatment guns truly work and how to deal with ailments from tendonitis to joint pain to precise injuries.

Similar: These Equipment Can Enable You Be 10 Situations Much more Successful

7. The Big Silence

The Significant Silence is hosted by my long-time close friend Karena Dawn, psychological overall health advocate, co-founder of a multi-million dollar physical fitness and wellness system, ToneItUp, trader and New York Instances finest-advertising writer of her book, The Huge Silence. “The place there is darkness, there is an immense chance for light,” states Dawn, who introduced The Huge Silence in early 2022 with a purpose to normalize conversations all around mental overall health and to empower people today to share their tales and switch their difficulties into triumphs. Irrespective of her pretty beneficial, legitimate, motivational and caring disposition, Karena experienced profound trauma and grief developing up. Her mother was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia which led Karena to expertise repressed emotions of guilt, shame, despair and at some point a suicide attempt developing up. Yet Karena was ready to locate deep joy and she shares this throughout her episodes. Episode #5 entitled How to Have Much more Delighted Days with Spirit Junkie and who Oprah named as a “New Thought Leader” Gabrielle Bernstein is just one of my favorites from this exhibit.

8. Foodtrainers

Foodtrainers is for the no-nonsense, give-it-to-me-in-30 minutes-or-considerably less listener fascinated by particular nutrition inquiries. Hosted New York town based dietitian and author, Lauren Slayton M.S. R.D., Slayton is blunt still entertaining and tackles specific topics this sort of as Should really We Halt Consuming Liquor, Are You Finding Ample Protein, Best Nutrition Traits, The Finest Diet for Your Brain and her most loved nourishment snacks and pantry staples. Slayton shares her own own hacks for journey, weight loss, snooze and breaks down what she seems to look at “woo woo” in the world of nutrition. Slayton has been featured on most major Tv set Networks, is a contributor to Bobbi Brown’s lifestyle system, JustBobbi.com, and is a good recipe developer. This girl is no BS, outstanding and very enlightening.

If you’re looking at Entrepreneur.com, it is really for the reason that you attempt daily to be a greater version of you. I share these podcasts in hopes of motivating and educating, and even tough you to use a podcast as an excuse to get out for a wander. I have found that often I phase out for a 20-moment wander and keep out for an hour since a podcast keeps me captivated.

WHO highlights oral health neglect affecting nearly half of the world’s population

A new Global Oral Health Status Report published today by the World Health Organization (WHO) provides the first-ever comprehensive picture of oral disease burden with data profiles for 194 countries, giving unique insights into key areas and markers of oral health that are relevant for decision-makers.

The report shows that almost half of the world’s population (45{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} or 3.5 billion people) suffer from oral diseases, with 3 out of every 4 affected people living in low- and middle-income countries. Global cases of oral diseases have increased by 1 billion over the last 30 years—a clear indication that many people do not have access to prevention and treatment of oral diseases.

“Oral health has long been neglected in global health, but many oral diseases can be prevented and treated with the cost-effective measures outlined in this report,” said WHO Director-General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “WHO is committed to providing guidance and support to countries so that all people, wherever they live and whatever their income, have the knowledge and tools needed to look after their teeth and mouths, and to access services for prevention and care when they need them.”

Rapid increase of oral diseases

The most common oral diseases are dental caries (tooth decay), severe gum disease, tooth loss and oral cancers.  Untreated dental caries is the single most common condition globally, affecting an estimated 2.5 billion people. Severe gum disease  ̶  a major cause of total tooth loss  ̶  is estimated to affect 1 billion people worldwide.  About 380 000 new cases of oral cancers are diagnosed every year.

The report underscores the glaring inequalities in access to oral health services, with a huge burden of oral diseases and conditions affecting the most vulnerable and disadvantaged populations. People on low incomes, people living with disabilities, older people living alone or in care homes, those living in remote and rural communities and people from minority groups carry a higher burden of oral diseases.

This pattern of inequalities is similar to other noncommunicable diseases such as cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and mental disorders. Risk factors common to noncommunicable diseases such as high sugar intake, all forms of tobacco use, and harmful use of alcohol all contribute to the global oral health crisis.

Barriers to delivering oral health services

Only a small percentage of the global population is covered by essential oral health services, and those with the greatest need often have the least access to services. The key barriers to delivering access to oral health services for all include:

  1. Oral health care requires high out-of-pocket expenditures. This often leads to catastrophic costs and significant financial burden for families and communities.
  2. The provision of oral health services largely relies on highly specialized providers using expensive high-tech equipment and materials, and these services are not well integrated with primary health care models.
  3. Poor information and surveillance systems, combined with low priority for public oral health research are major bottlenecks to developing more effective oral health interventions and policies.

Opportunities to improve global oral health

The report showcases many promising opportunities to improve the state of global oral health including:

  • adopting a public health approach by addressing common risk factors through promoting a well-balanced diet low in sugars, stopping use of all forms of tobacco, reducing alcohol consumption and improving access to effective and affordable fluoride toothpaste.
  • planning oral health services as part of national health and improving integration of oral health services in primary health care as part of universal health coverage.
  • redefining oral health workforce models to respond to population needs and expanding competencies of non-dental healthcare workers to expand oral health service coverage; and
  • strengthening information systems by collecting and integrating oral health data into national health monitoring systems.

“Placing people at the heart of oral health services is critical if we are to achieve the vision of universal health coverage for all individuals and communities by 2030,” said Dr Bente Mikkelsen, WHO Director for Noncommunicable Diseases.

She added: “This report acts as a starting point by providing baseline information to help countries monitor progress of implementation, while also providing timely and relevant feedback to decision-makers at the national level. Together, we can change the current situation of oral health neglect.”

 

Note to editors

To watch the launch event on Friday, 18 November from 14.00 – 15:30 CET, please register at  https://who.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_hDqiDjW9TBm4fSVljj3zQw.

The Global Oral Health Status Report uses the latest available data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and global WHO surveys. The report is directed at policymakers, practitioners, researchers, development agencies and members of the private sector and civil society. 

In 2022, the World Health Assembly adopted a global strategy on oral health with a vision of universal health coverage for oral health for all individuals and communities by 2030. A detailed action plan is under development to help countries translate the global strategy into practice. This includes a monitoring framework for tracking progress, with measurable targets to be achieved by 2030.

Why did a rural Nevada county turn down money to create a public health department?

ELKO, Nev. — When Elko County commissioners rejected a $500,000 grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that could have helped the county create a health department or health district, Kayla Hopkins pleaded with them to reconsider.

Hopkins, who has lived for nearly nine years in the sprawling rural county that forms the northeastern corner of Nevada, told the board how she struggled through postpartum depression and needed mental health resources.

“I was unable to get the help that I needed,” Hopkins said during a public meeting in late 2021, adding that she fell into what could be considered a mental breakdown. She said she was sent by air ambulance more than 300 miles away to Carson City, where she received care in a psychiatric facility for 10 days.

“I was away from my family,” Hopkins said. “I was away from my support system here, and I still struggle with mental health, and I still cannot get the help that I need because we just don’t have it here.”

Pleas from Hopkins and others weren’t enough to sway the elected commissioners. Neither were 11 letters from local health leaders urging the board to take the infusion of public health funding. Four of the county’s five commissioners, citing concerns about government overreach and their lack of trust in federal agencies, voted against pursuing the grant. Nearly a year later, as the pandemic grinds toward a third year and with the arrival of monkeypox, the county still is without a public health department to respond.

And the same mistrust of agencies administering grants for public health persists elsewhere.

Elko County, home to about 54,000 people, wasn’t alone in rejecting federal aid aimed at bolstering public health in the past year. Experts say they were surprised and concerned to see the rare local or state leader, swayed by political partisanship, dismiss funding opportunities for historically limited public health systems.

As many conservative leaders and their constituents railed against measures meant to combat Covid — things like masking policies and promoting vaccines — the pandemic revealed long-standing fissures in the country’s public health infrastructure, particularly in rural and underserved communities.

“Partisan politics has poisoned the well to a point that we’re willing to sacrifice the health of our citizens,” said Brian Castrucci, president and CEO of the de Beaumont Foundation, a national nonprofit that advocates for public health policy. “Is the political grandstanding worth it?”

Over the past two years, officials in Idaho, Iowa, and New Hampshire rejected Covid relief money, their decisions often accompanied by political pronouncements about federal government overreach. And officials representing local governments across the country, including Cochise and Pinal counties in Arizona, echoed those moves. A survey of local governments in 15 states conducted by the National League of Cities found more than 200 small governments declined pandemic relief funds, a small percentage of the money available to small governments.

Elko commissioners turned down a workforce grant funded by the CDC, money intended to “establish, expand, and sustain a public health workforce, including school nurses.” The funding would have flowed through the state to the county, allowing it to hire two employees dedicated to public health services for two years.

County workers in charge of researching the grant and pitching it to the board said the idea was to conduct a study in those two years that would help them determine how much it would cost to create a local health department or a health district, involving neighboring counties.

Elko County has not had a public health department since budget woes pushed officials to dissolve it more than 15 years ago.

Adriane Casalotti, chief of government and public affairs for the National Association of County and City Health Officials, said communities across the country have generally clamored for increased funding during the pandemic, which strained already underfunded and understaffed public health infrastructure.

“That being said,” Casalotti said, “in recent months, I’d say, we’ve heard of a handful of health departments that either would not apply for or couldn’t accept … specific grants,” involving Covid vaccines.

At an Elko County commission meeting in late 2021, then-transit management coordinator Abigail Wheeler pitched the grant to the board and a roomful of residents eager to air their grievances about the CDC and levy claims of federal government overreach, overspending, and corruption regarding the pandemic response.

Wheeler began by asking county commissioners to keep an open mind.

Why did a rural Nevada county turn down money to create a public health department?
Abigail Wheeler presented a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Elko County, Nev., commission last year, telling it the funding could help the town create a health department or district and give Elko more local control over public health. The commission disagreed.Elko County via Kaiser Health News

“I am very aware that this is basically the worst timing that this grant could come forward because there’s a lot of distaste over public health because of what’s happened with Covid and our whole community, our whole country, and worldwide,” she said. “We have been beat to death, the fallout of the Covid pandemic.”

Wheeler, now the grants and contracts manager for the county, began by reminding the commissioners that creating a local health department or district was a goal that predated the pandemic and the polarization it triggered.

A 2019 meeting with the state Department of Health and Human Services underscored the need for more local public health infrastructure.

“They’re thinking about things like tuberculosis and measles and restaurant inspections,” Wheeler said. “They’re not thinking about Covid. And they’re saying to themselves, ‘We can’t get to you if you had a TB case. We’re 370 miles away from Elko County.’”

Elko is like a landlocked island, Wheeler said during an interview with KHN. Though smaller in population compared with Clark or Washoe counties in Nevada, Elko spans more than 17,000 square miles, making it the fourth-largest county by area in the contiguous U.S. and the second-largest in Nevada.

“We have to be our own cavalry,” Wheeler said.

Commissioners and community members who opposed the grant said Elko didn’t need more public health resources or a health district or department. They said they were concerned about giving up local autonomy and growing bureaucracy. They also expressed mistrust of the CDC.

“You’re 100{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} factual that the timing couldn’t be worse,” said Jon Karr, then the chairman of the commission, during the meeting. Although he said he did not buy into all the conspiracy theories about the CDC that others touted, he added that he did not think CDC officials should be trusted.

Commissioner Rex Steninger said he voted against the grant because he feared the commission would be “subservient” to the new entity. “Grants always have strings attached,” he wrote in an emailed response to questions from KHN. “We do not want the CDC tenacles [sic] reaching in to Elko County.”

Wheeler pointed to the fractured local public health system during the meeting, saying creating a health district or department could help reduce bureaucracy and give the county more control over decisions in state officials’ hands. She said it’s evident the county needs more resources, citing public health response duties she took on in her position as transit manager.

“We’re not public health experts, we’re just people who are willing to step up to the plate and take this on,” Wheeler said, referring to other county employees who helped with the public health response to Covid.

Wheeler was disappointed the county board turned down the grant opportunity, she told KHN in October. She said she would still like to see public health become a function of the county someday.

Since speaking at the meeting nearly a year ago, Hopkins said she found the mental health services she needed locally. But not everyone is as lucky as she is to find the help they need close to home, she said. The county’s decision to reject the CDC grant makes her sad, she said, but she accepts it was the commission’s decision to make.

Other local leaders saw the need for increased public health resources amid the pandemic. The Elko City Council wrote a letter of support for the CDC grant the day before the commission rejected it. “We know for sure it’s not something that the city wants to tackle by ourselves,” said Curtis Calder, city manager. “But if our regional partners want to do it as a partnership, we stand at the ready to assist where we can.”

Other rural Nevada counties have collaborated with the University of Nevada-Reno School of Medicine to create the Central Nevada Health District, serving four counties and a small city near Reno. “If we won’t step up and help ourselves and our constituents, we can’t complain when the State doesn’t provide what we need or expect,” wrote Dr. J.J. Goicoechea, a commissioner in neighboring Eureka County and the interim state veterinarian, in an emailed response to KHN.

Casalotti said there are advantages to having local health departments staffed and run by people who live in the community as opposed to a state government hundreds of miles away.

“One of the things that we’re hopeful that people can learn from the pandemic is that you don’t want to have to build the plane while flying it,” she said. “At some point, you need to take the leap because the next crisis is just around the corner.”

But polarization remains an obstacle, Castrucci said.

“This has become a holy war, this has become a war of right and wrong,” he said. “I don’t know how to get through that to a place where we are prioritizing the health of our nation.”

KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. Together with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one of the three major operating programs at KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit organization providing information on health issues to the nation.

Follow NBC HEALTH on Twitter & Facebook.

New health care regulators ask OneCare executives for measurable results

New health care regulators ask OneCare executives for measurable results
OneCare Vermont officials present their budget proposal to the Green Mountain Care Board in October 2019. From left: Vicki Loner, CEO; Tom Borys, vice president of finance and Sara Barry, COO. Photo by Mike Dougherty/VTDigger

OneCare, the nonprofit that distributes millions of public and private health care dollars to providers throughout Vermont, has asked state regulators to greenlight a $15 million operating budget — a slight decrease from this year — as part of an annual review process. 

This is the first OneCare budget cycle for most members of the Green Mountain Care Board, the five-member body that regulates major players in Vermont’s health care sector, including hospitals. And the board’s new members seem keen to put OneCare executives in the hot seat. 

During a five-hour marathon hearing last week, the board repeatedly pressed OneCare executives for quantitative results, whether that meant reducing Vermonters’ health care costs or improving their quality of care.

“Vermonters, either through taxpayer-funded health care groups, out-of-pocket expenses, copays or insurance, have borne the bulk of those staggering numbers,” said Owen Foster, the board’s new chair, at the start of the meeting. “And for that they deserve results.” 

Owen Foster, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board, at the board’s office in Montpelier on Oct. 27. Photo by Riley Robinson/VTDigger

Thom Walsh, who was appointed to the board in December, asked OneCare CEO Vicki Loner to name the organization’s top three key performance indicators, or metrics of success. Loner declined to name any, saying, “They’re going to our board to be reviewed.” 

OneCare is an accountable care organization, or ACO. It’s been described as a policy experiment because it’s intended to shift the state’s health care spending from a fee-for-service model to one in which providers get a flat fee per patient, with incentives to keep people well for the lowest cost. It funnels money from Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers to health care providers across the state, ranging from big hospitals to independent primary care doctors. 

OneCare has a $15 million operating budget to manage these various contracts between payers and providers and to conduct data analysis of the health care system. Its operating costs are funded by Vermont hospitals, which pay millions in fees each year to be part of the ACO. 

Tom Borys, OneCare’s vice president of finance, cited OneCare’s increased enrollment as one of his top indicators of success. He argued that increased participation in an ACO model is inherently good because it changes the incentive structure behind participants’ health care. 

But Walsh quickly cut him off, seemingly unimpressed. 

“What I’m struggling to find is an outcome that would be meaningful to Vermonters, and you may be able to say something like, ‘reduced (emergency department) visits,’” Walsh said. “Those are outcome measures that matter to patients, and I can’t find them.” 

As part of this year’s budget process, OneCare submitted a study comparing it with a group of 20 similar ACOs nationwide. OneCare outperformed other ACOs on some cost metrics, including cost of inpatient and outpatient surgeries. 

However, it found OneCare patients went to the emergency department at significantly greater rates, averaging 36{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} higher than patients in other ACOs. Vermonters in OneCare had 18{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} fewer visits to primary care providers and paid 30{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} more for prescription drugs. 

In a June 2021 report, State Auditor Doug Hoffer recommended that the care board find a clear way to measure the ACO’s effectiveness, to determine whether OneCare saved Vermonters more money than it cost. The auditor said that assessment should be a prerequisite for any new all-payer agreement with the federal government, which is expected to be worked out in the next few years. 

“On a high level … it’s important that any regulated entity, like OneCare going before the board, gets a good, careful review,” Mike Fisher, chief health care advocate at Vermont Legal Aid, said after the hearing. “And so I’m pleased to see the level of questioning from the board.” 

OneCare executives pushed back on some of the board members’ demands for quantitative impact. They argued that changing the entire health care system takes a long time. 

“How do you manage the one-year payer contract cycles and performance expectations with long-term outcomes that, our clinicians remind us all the time, it’s going to take years, decades, generations to address?” OneCare Chief Operating Officer Sara Barry said. 

When governments or organizations invest in big, upstream factors that impact people’s health — things such housing, walkable communities and food security — those benefits don’t have an immediate, measurable impact on the health of a group, Loner said. OneCare executives also noted that about half of the ACO’s lifespan has been during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Walsh agreed with executives that systems change is a long game but countered that six years should be enough time to at least have some way of measuring results. 

“If OneCare’s role was to support through data analytics, maybe trainings and other things over time, wouldn’t there be improvements that we could point to, right?” Walsh said. “If we look year over year, and it’s been going on for five or six years, wouldn’t there be improvements that we could point to, even if it’s just a little piece?”

About 296,000 Vermonters are “attributed” to OneCare — meaning they see a provider who participates in OneCare and is accountable to the ACO’s performance targets. These 296,000 patients are expected to generate $1.4 billion in health care spending in 2023, an expected $97 million increase from this year. 

Overall, OneCare’s requested $15 million operating budget would reduce its expenses by about $248,000, or 1.6{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}, from 2022. The ACO cut costs by reducing its in-person workspace and by combining some operations, such as data analytics, with UVM Health Network, executives told the care board. 

OneCare’s budget request includes a roughly 3{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f} cost-of-living increase for employees. If the budget were approved, Loner, the CEO, would make more than $490,000 next year. 

Aside from the organization’s operating expenses, OneCare would also be responsible for another $29.9 million, which it would distribute to health care providers throughout the state. 

That money includes bonus payments for providers who reach certain population health goals. It would also fund targeted investment and programs in specific areas, such as about $212,000 for the state’s five nonprofit Area Agencies on Aging.

In response to questioning by Foster, Loner said OneCare had conducted no cost-benefit analysis on how it should allocate money to particular programs or types of providers. 

The proposed budget would raise hospital participation fees by 1{bf0515afdcaddba073662ceb89fbb62b6b1bf123143c0e06b788e1946e8c353f}, generating a total of $19.8 million. If approved, this budget also “escalates risk quite dramatically” for Vermont hospitals, Borys, OneCare’s vice president of finance, told the care board.

By participating in OneCare, hospitals join a risk pool. If hospitals meet certain cost targets and quality goals by the end of the year, hospitals can earn funds from the pool. If hospitals miss these targets, they could owe money — potentially millions. Theoretically, this payment model is meant to change financial incentives, to encourage coordinated care and reduce expensive or unnecessary services. 

With the onset of the pandemic, OneCare had substantially reduced how much risk hospitals took on through their shared pool, from $42 million in the pre-pandemic portion of 2020, down to about $16 million for the past couple years. The proposed 2023 budget would raise the stakes for hospitals back to roughly pre-pandemic levels, at $36 million. 

At last week’s meeting, Foster asked OneCare executives what the hospitals’ risk actually means: If a hospital fails to meet certain targets and owes money at the end of the year, who ultimately pays that penalty? 

“Would any executives or individuals who are responsible for that loss have, actually, any skin in the game?” Foster said. 

Hospital leaders are not individually responsible to OneCare’s goals, Borys said, but they are accountable to their boards. 

“In the sense that if they had to make a large shared loss payment, the boards are going to consider that when evaluating management,” Borys said.

“So if the hospitals, ultimately as an organization, would foot the bill, is it fair to say that by and large, Vermonters are paying that?” Foster said. “Given that’s the source of the revenue streams?”

“I think through extension, there’s some truth to that,” Borys said. “But I will also add that the complexity of health care funding is huge. And if the general belief is that every dollar that funds health care comes from individual people, which is probably fair, then I’d say the answer is yes.” 

International Men’s Day 2022: Tips for men to reduce prostate cancer risk | Health

Prostate cancer occurs when the cells in the prostate gland which is found only in males start to grow out of control. Prostate gland is located just below the bladder and in front of the rectum and makes some of the fluid that is part of semen. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide and unfortunately its incidence is increasing in India as it has moved from being the eighth most common cancer in males in 1990s to the third rank by 2015. It is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men worldwide. (Also read: Prostate Cancer: Causes, symptoms, risk factors and treatment)

Can one prevent the prostate cancer? There are certain risk factors like age, race and genetics that cannot be modified while lifestyle factors can be modified to an extent.

“There is no proven strategy to prevent prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is primarily a disease of aging. As you get older, your chances of developing prostate cancer increase. Race and genetics also play a significant role. If your father, brother or multiple blood relatives had prostate cancer, you are more likely to get it, too. Worldwide African Americans have increased risk of having prostate cancer. These risk factors of age, race and genetics are non-modifiable risk factors. Preventing prostate cancer might be difficult if you have these risk factors, but screening early and often can help ensure that if you do get cancer, it’s diagnosed and treated as soon as possible,” says Dr Shrikanth Atluri, Consultant Uro-Oncologist and Robotic Surgeon within the division of Surgical Oncology (Cancer Surgery) at Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai.

LIFESTYLE FACTORS THAT INCREASE RISK OF PROSTATE CANCER

A wide variety of environmental or dietary factors may be associated with the risk of developing prostate cancer.

“Poor eating habits and diets that heavily rely on fats and animal proteins can cause DNA damage and lead to cancer. Even men who are already at greater risk due to age, race or genetics can reduce their chances of developing prostate cancer by adopting healthy diets and lifestyles. Improve your diet by reducing fat, charred meat, eating more fruits and vegetables, maintain healthy weight, regular exercise, stop smoking and drinking are the lifestyle changes to be adopted to which may help in reducing the risk of having a prostate cancer,” says Dr Atluri.

Dr. Preetam Kumar Jain – Senior Consultant Oncologist and Hematologist, Masina Hospital, says that although there is no definite method to reduce the risk of prostate cancer and certain risk factors are irreversible, there are studies that reversible risk factors when controlled can help in reducing the risk of prostate cancers. Dr Jain suggests some tips.

TIPS TO REDUCE RISK OF PROSTATE CANCER

– Healthy lifestyle: One should stay away from unhealthy food, eat nutritious food and sleep on time.

– Regular exercise: One should exercise 20 minutes a day and 5 days a week.

– Avoid Obesity: Staying physically active and eating healthy food can help. Weight problems should be addressed early.

– Maintain Body mass index

– Eating diets rich in antioxidants such as fruits and vegetables can help reduce risk of prostate cancer.

– Do not go overboard with dairy products and calcium content.

– Avoid diet containing red and processed meats.

– Some studies say that drugs that inhibit 5 alpha reductase inhibitors and aspirin may reduce the reduce the risk of prostate cancer and mortality. However, they are not FDA recommended as of now.

“It is also important to identify early symptoms of prostate related problem. Symptoms like frequent micturition, incomplete voiding of urine, nocturia, could be possible signs of prostate related problems. If you have a family history of prostate cancer, then the subsequent generation members are at a risk of prostate cancer, at least a decade earlier. Knowing this genetic susceptibility, you may have to remain alert as your age advances. New genetic studies are in the pipeline for better understanding of the prostate cancer. Mutation analysis like BRCA and HRR testing are now being recommended in patients with prostate cancer,” says Dr Jain.

Follow more stories on Facebook & Twitter